Editing Detailed Notes On Lawyer In Chandigarh

2011, the order of ad-interim injunction was maintained but the trial court was directed to decide the application for injunction on its own merits within a period of one month. , VENKATARAMA AYYAR, B. But the question here is whe- ther the right to hold the lands under a fixed assessment survived after the acquisition by the Government under the land acquisition proceedings, and that depends on the effect of section VIII of Act VI of 1857.<br><br>The claim for  Advocates ([http://nrilegalservices.me/services/making-a-will/ see this website]) the rent already due by the respondent to the appellants up to August 1, 1942, has been settled by the judgments of the courts below and we are not called upon to canvass these findings of fact any further. State of Punjab (2015)3 SCC 220 sounds an awakening caveat: A strain of piognance and disquiet over the insensitive approach of the court concerned in the textual facts in the context of fair trial in the following observations of this Court in Vinod Kumar vs. SINHA and JAFER IMAM JJ.<br><br>Chatterjee for the petitioners is that section 3 (3) requires that when an order of detention is made by one of the authorities mentioned in section 3(2)-in this case it was so made- that authority should forthwith report the fact to the State Government together with the grounds on which the order was made; that  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/rights-of-way/ see this website]) this provision is clearly intended to safeguard the rights of the detenu, as it is on a consideration of these grounds that the Government has to decide whether it will approve of the order or not;, that when therefore the grounds had not been made available to the State Government before they had approved of the order, as happened in the present case,  Advocates, [http://nri-world.com see this website], there was a clear violation of the procedure prescribed by the statute, and that the detention became illegal.<br><br>" The appellant took an appeal to the High Court of the Punjab and Dulat J. 1 proposing to cancel the transfer order on the ground that contrary to the statement in the application for transfer that the partners of the partnership firm will be Directors of the private limited company, the Directors of the private limited company who were partners of the firm were replaced by new Directors on 6th August, 2012 and the private limited company was listed as subsidiary of Ultra Tech Cement Limited Company (UTCL) with the Bombay Stock Exchange.<br><br> dissenting) (1) Section 57 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 is not uncon- stitutional, because, it is an instance of the State taking preventive measures in the interests of the public and for safeguarding individual rights, by preventing a person, who has been proved to be a criminal from acting in a way which may be a repetition of his criminal propensities, and the restrictions that it imposes on the individual's right to reside in and move freely in any part of India are reasonable within the meaning of clause (5) of Art.<br><br> To appreciate the 566 reasoning 'behind this decision, it is necessary to refer to section 25-C of the Industrial Disputes Act, which runs as follows: If, as observed in the above passage, the liability to pay assessment was "an integral part or an inseverable incident of the title", then surely it was also extinguished along with the title of the occupants under section VIII of Act No. held that taking into consideration the sanction which will be quoted hereinafter: The Nagar Panchayat in its turn approached the High Court with a writ petition in which by order dated 9.<br><br> On this development, a show cause notice dated 21st April, 2014 was issued to Respondent No. On these sections, the argument of Mr. This development showed that the transfer was secured by a conspiracy and in circumvention of the rules. But the point for decision there was whether the Municipal Corporation of Bombay could acquire by prescription a right to hold the lands rent-free, they having entered into possession under a resolution of the Government that no rent would be charged.<br><br> In a situation where there are more than one secured creditor of a sick industrial company or it has been jointly financed by secured creditors, and at least 60 per cent of such secured creditors in value of the amount outstanding as on a record date do not agree upon exercise of the right to realise their security under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 will continue to have full play.<br><br> 19 of the Constitution. And the passage quoted above merely laid down that when title to the land was acquired by the Municipal Corporation by prescription, one of the rights acquired as part of the prescriptive title 'was the right to hold the lands revenue-free. , notwithstanding this finding, the Tribunal went on to hold that the application under section 23 of the Act was maintainable. "The charge under section 5 (1)(a)  Advocates ([http://nrilegalservices.me/how-to-settle-nri-rent-disputes-with-the-tenants/ see this website]) of the Prevention  Advocates ([http://nrizone.in websites]) of Corruption Act, 1947, has been established against him beyond reasonable doubt.<br><br>He is guilty of an offence punishable under sub-section (2) of section 5 of the said Act. The more important questions that require to be dealt with are: (1) What is the amount which the appellants are entitled to recover from the respondent as and by way of the value of the two trucks in the alternative-the respondent being admittedly not in a position to re-deliver the said trucks to them and (2) what are the damages which the appellants are entitled to recover by reason of wrongful detention of the trucks till the date of judgment.