Editing Not Known Factual Statements About Advocate In Chandigarh

That petition was, however, dismissed, as withdrawn. The seal was then handed over to PW1 ASI Bishamber Lal. While enacting Section 24(2), Parliament definitely had in its view Section 31 of the 1894 Act. Reference was also made to earlier decision in BALCO case (supra) laying down that Courts may not ordinarily interfere with economic decisions and wisdom of economic policies of the State in exercise of its power of judicial review. The appellant was produced before him and PW4 was also acquainted with the facts of the case.<br><br>These judgments are in the context of situations where highest public authorities had applied their mind to all the facts in which case the Court was not inclined to interfere. Ponds (I) Limited to that extent. In Vedanta case (supra)[16] approval granted by the Government of India  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/property-law/ my company]) for acquisition of majority stake in Cairn Energy Ltd. PC was recorded by PW2 Head Constable Om Parkash. No public authority, in the present case, was even conscious that mining lease was being transferred to UTCL and at what price or for what benefit to the public.<br><br>Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/adoption-and-cara/ my company]) This Court held that various commercial and technical aspects have been duly considered by the Government of India and this Court could not sit in judgment over the commercial and business decisions so taken. He  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/nri/ my company]) had also filed a petition (petition No. The sample and the remainder were separately sealed and taken in possession  Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/help/ my company]) vide memo Ext. On weighment, it was found to be 1kg 50gms. 32 of the Constitution in which he had prayed for the issue of an appropriate writ to the Union of India, respondent 1, and the 924 Director General of Health Services, New Delhi, respondent 2, directing them to forbear from giving effect to an order of dismissal passed by respondent 2 against the petitioner on October 3, 1955.<br><br>397 of 1955) under Art. PC was sent to the Police Station for registration of crime, whereupon FIR Ext. The opium was found in a polythene bag tied in a cloth around the stomach of the appellant. 11 of the Act, to direct the Banks to meet the reasonable expenses of the workmen in a pending proceeding in order to ensure a fair and effective hearing.  Advocates; [http://slachd.com/practice-areas/division-of-property-between-husband-and-wife/ my website], The grounds on which the decision was based were these: (1) the Banks were well organised and their managements we're -in.<br><br>Their Workmen (1), the question of facilities for effective representation of their cases on behalf of the employees was raised and considered at -some length. 12) Learned senior counsel for the respondent-State finally contended that the trial Court rightly convicted and sentenced the appellants under Section 304B and 498A of the IPC and the High Court upheld the same with some modification in the sentence. It is essential that there shall be some rational connection between the fact proved and the ultimate fact presumed, and that the inference of one fact from proof of another shall not be so unreasonable as to be a purely arbitrary mandate.<br><br>" As to the presumptions, of course the legislatures may go a good way in raising one or in changing the burden of proof, but there are limits. The appellants deserve a deterrent punishment in the present case. (CIL) was challenged and a direction was sought for the ONGC to exercise right of pre- emption over shares of CIL. A sample was taken and put in a small plastic bag while the remainder was put in a bag of cloth. 229 In the well-known case, Certain Banking Companies V.<br><br> Such is not the position in the present case. But at the same time, we do not think that by use of the word paid, Parliament intended receipt of compensation by the landowners/persons interested. From that one thing is clear that it did not intend to equate the word paid to offered or tendered. Further challenge was to transfer of ONGC shareholding in CIL to Vedanta, a private company, as being contrary to public interest.<br><br> 79 at 86-87 ; [1916] USSC 126; 60 L. Thereafter a wireless message was sent to PW4 Shyam Singh Rana, DSP Gohana who reached the spot. Contention 2 also, therefore, fails and is rejected. The decision given was that the Tribunal had power and jurisdiction, under sub- s. Therefore, the present judgment is confined to the two appeals, and the relevant facts relating thereto are stated below. On the facts on record, therefore, it must be held that the Tribunal was perfectly justified in taking the view that charging a separate price for the metal containers supplied to M/s Ponds (I) Limited could not stand justified under Section 4(1)(a) proviso and, therefore, to that separate price charged from the Ponds (I) Limited, the extent of benefit obtained by the assessee on interest-free loan was required to be reloaded by hiking the price charged from M/s.<br><br> Thereafter, on the instructions of PW4, personal search of the appellant was undertaken which resulted in recovery of opium from the possession of the appellant. In our view, it is not appropriate to give a literal construction to the expression paid used in this sub-section [sub-section (2) of Section 24].