What Does Lawyer In Chandigarh Mean

Whereas, the 1988 suit for partition was for plaintiffs one- half share in the property based on her birth right. A prudent analysis of evidence of PW-1 would clearly suggest that there are no discrepancies in his evidence and rather it abundantly makes clear that he is a wholly reliable witness and his evidence is trustworthy. These observations support the submissions against the meaning of " export " or " import " being merely taking out of or bringing Advocates [see this] into.

The prosecution was launched on 19-4-1950 and the appellant was called upon to answer the charge on 9-3-1951; and now that the case has been remanded we are in the year 1956. On July 9, 1949, the appellant was served with a charge sheet under r. , and stay there till mid-night or past mid- night. 376, Indian Penal Code. In February 1947, he was transferred to the Co-operative Societies Department and posted as subinspector in the Milk Scheme.

In his Advocates - see this, office room, there was a bed-stead with a bedding spread thereon. He used to occupy the bed and requisition the services of girls to massage his body. The facts leading up to the present appeal are shortly as follows: On April 6, 1943, the appellant was appointed a sub-inspector under the Delhi Audit Fund. You should also state in your reply whether you wish to be heard in person or whether you will produce defence. The price of the sale of a factory is ordinarily a capital receipt, but it may be an income receipt in the case of a person whose business it is to buy and sell factories" (Per Lord Macmillan in Van Den Berghs, Ltd.

After recording the information, the police officer-in-charge of the Maniktala police station, investigated the case and submitted a charge-sbeet against the appellant. Shaw Wallace [1935] 19 T. 205 were performed on 8-9-1948 and 15-9-1948. On August 1, 1948, the appellant was transferred to the Rehabilitation Department of the Co- operative Societies and posted as sub-inspector. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Delhi, within ten days from the receipt of this charge sheet".

It is called the ' Nari Kalyan Ashram ' and is located in one of the quarters of the city of Calcutta. The appellant, very naturally, said on 27-4-1951, two and a half years after the alleged offences: The bag was found to have contained a rubber sheath along with other articles. Cause of action is entirely different. Advocates [see this] Inspector of Taxes(1)). The finding of the High Court that PW1 was not present on the spot is untenable and treating his evidence as unreliable, is totally perverse Advocates (click to read more) and bad in law in view of the true nature and circumstances of the case.

After formulating eight several charges the document concluded as follows: " You are, therefore, called upon to show cause why you should not be dismissed from the service. As succinctly addressed by the first appellate court, the 1962 suit for the entire property was based on a settlement deed and it was a suit for possession. It ought not to have rejected the ocular evidence of the informant PW 1 Bhola Singh, the ultimate victim and father of the three deceased persons.

After the preliminary inquiry by a magistrate, the appellant was committed for trial to the Court of Session on a charge of rape upon the two girls, under s. 6(1) of the Rules which had been framed by the Chief Commissioner, Delhi to provide for the appointment to the subordinate services under his administrative control and the discipline and rights of appeal of members of those services. On July 1, 1949, the appellant was suspended by the then Deputy Commissioner, Delhi.

The nature of a receipt may vary according to the nature of the trade in connection with which it arises. Shri Vishwajit Singh, learned counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the High Court committed a manifest and grave error in analyzing the evidences of PW1 and PW2 and acquitted the accused without proper application of mind. In order to appreciate the grounds raised in support of the appeal by the learned counsel for the appellant, it is necessary to state the following facts: The appellant was the honorary secretary of a large institution for receiving and looking after young girls and women who had no homes of their own or had gone astray.

and the plaintiff's counsel by that admits himself out of court. It may also be borne in mind that the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act are not in pari materia with those of the English Income-tax Statutes so that the decisions on the English Acts are in general of no assistance in construing the Indian Acts (Vide the observations of the Privy Council in Commissioner of Income- tax v. The appellant in his capacity as the secretary, used to come to the Ashram daily in the evening at about 7 p.

On July 3, 1947, the the appellant was confirmed by the then Deputy Commissioner of Delhi who was also the ex-officio Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The reply should reach the Asst. The chargesheet was signed by Shri Rameshwar Dayal who was at that time the Deputy Commissioner of Delhi and was admittedly the authority competent to dismiss the appellant.