Little Known Facts About NRI Legal Services.

The application was rejected by the respondent. Article 38 of the Constitution of India, Advocates (try this site) which Advocates (pop over to this website) is a Directive Principle of State Policy, reads as under: Article 286(2) of the Constitution of India Parliament may by law formulate principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in any of the ways mentioned in clause (1). Held, that the effective part of the notice made it clear that the requisition, which was to remove the encroachment caused by the compound wall, was lawfully made, that the alteration of the conviction under S.

The appellant, desiring to know on what materials the notice was issued, applied for copies of the materials on the basis of which he respondent had formed his opinion. (3) Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer, the contract is called a sale, but where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an agreement to sell.

The respondent issued a notice under S. The learned ASG further draws our attention to clause 16. (emphasis laid by this Court) India is a welfare State. The brother died and the appellant claimed to have become the sole heir. Held that, the certificate granted by the High Court amounts to a condemnation of the practice of summary dismissal of appeals, especially in jury trials. 21 It must, therefore follow as a necessary corollary from the principle of equality enshrined in Article 14 that though the State is entitled to refuse to enter into relationship with any one, yet if it does so, it cannot arbitrarily choose any person it likes for entering into such relationship and discriminate between persons similarly circumstanced, but it must act in conformity with some standard or principle which meets the test of reasonableness and non-discrimination and any departure from such standard or principle would be invalid unless it can be supported or justified on some rational and non-discriminatory ground.

Such practice prevails in most High Courts and has the sanction of statute law. No certificate should be granted on a mere question of fact nor in a case where there are no complexities of law involved requiring an authoritative interpretation by the Supreme Court. Section 4(2) Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place inside a State, if the goods are within the State (a) in the case of specific or ascertained goods, at the time the contract of sale is made; and (b) in the case of unascertained or future goods, at the time of their appropriation to the contract of sale by the seller or by the buyer, whether assent of the other party is prior or subsequent to such appropriation.

7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, in respect of the share of the brother on the ground that the brother had left a widow and a son who had migrated to Pakistan. The claim for the rent already due by the respondent to the appellants up to August 1, 1942, has been settled by the judgments of the courts below and we are not called upon to canvass these findings of fact any further. Though Section 397 IPC deals with robbery or dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt and prescribes punishment by way of imprisonment of not less than seven years, in our view, the High Court ought to have decided the appeals on merit without remanding the case to the trial court for fresh adjudication after framing charge under Section 397 IPC and recording additional evidence, if deemed necessary.

The more important questions that require to be dealt with are: (1) What is the amount which the appellants are entitled to recover from the respondent as and by way of the value of the two trucks in the alternative-the respondent being admittedly not in a position to re-deliver the said trucks to them and (2) what are the damages which the appellants are entitled to recover by reason of wrongful detention of the trucks till the date of judgment.

The appellant and his brother owned certain properties inherited from their father. 226 of the Advocates (try this site) Constitution in the High Court which was also dismissed. The appellant filed a petition under Art. The appellant obtained special leave and contended that the notice was issued without jurisdiction as there was no material before the respondent to justify his issuing of the notice and that the application for the copies had been improperly -ejected by the respondent.

Having regard to the number of persons allegedly involved in the offences, as disclosed by the prosecution, the crimes committed are of murder in the course of robbery together with lurking house trespass and house breaking by night in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment with common intention. IRCTC will not renew any contract required to be handed over to zonal railways on expiry of the contract. Thus, the order dated 16th December, 2014 was valid. The writ petition was defended by the State with the plea that change of all the directors and shareholding amounted to transfer of the lease in violation of Rule 15 which was void under Rule 72.

1 All existing major and minor catering units will be awarded and managed by the zonal railways, except Food Plaza, Food Courts, fast food units. 3 of the 2010 Policy which reads as under: All such contracts presently being managed by the Advocates (try this site) IRCTC, on expiry of the contract period, will be awarded by the zonal railways. (3) Unless a different intention appears, the Rules contained in sections 20 to 24 are Rules for ascertaining the intention of the Advocates - try this site - parties as to the time at which the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer.