Difference between revisions of "The Lawyer In Chandigarh Diaries"

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
But before noticing the proviso and its effect, it is necessary to mention the following facts which may be taken to have been made out on the record. Sale of Goods Act, 1930- Section 4 - Sale and agreement to sell (1) A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price. Any contrary opinion would go rise to large scale conflicts of claims and usages as to what is an essential religious practice with no acceptable or adequate forum for resolution.<br><br>The learned Solicitor General appearing for the appellant before us has Advocates - [https://lexlords.com/direction-under-section-482-of-crpc/ click here for more info] - urged that there is no such inflexible rule of law as is assumed by the High Court, viz. (4) She went back to Pakistan in April, 1949, on the expiry of that temporary permit. The determination of the question as, to whether an interest created by such is deed is vested or contingent 89 has to be guided generally by the principles recognised under,ss. (1) Kumar Rani went to Karachi in July, 1948.<br><br>This proviso is as follows: It is peremptory in its scope and makes no exception for such a case, i. Moreover, there is some amount of uncertainty with regard to the prescription contained in the Agamas. in Shirur Mutt (supra) with regard to complete autonomy of a denomination to decide as to what constitutes an essential religious practice, a view that has also been subsequently echoed by this Court though as a minority view. (2) Her story that she went there temporarily for medical treatment has been doubted by the High Court and appears to us to be unfounded.<br><br>The development of this branch of jurisprudence primarily arises out of claimed rights of religious groups and denominations to complete autonomy and the prerogative of exclusive determination of essential religious practices and principles on the bedrock of the constitutional guarantees under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution and the judicial understanding of the inter-play between Article 25(2)(b) and 26(b) of the Constitution in the context of such claims.<br><br>He has also drawn our attention to the case in Bernard v. The Ecclesiastical jurisprudence in India, sans any specific Ecclesiastical jurisdiction, revolves around the exposition of the constitutional guarantees under Articles 25 and 26 as made from time to time. That apart the complete autonomy contemplated in Shirur Mutt (supra) and the meaning of outside authority must not be torn out of the context in which the views, already extracted, came to be recorded (page 1028).<br><br>Even such a wife must be deemed not to be a citizen of India unless the particular facts bring her case within the proviso to article 7. Mohana Krishna Mudaliar (1). In such a situation one is reminded of the Advocates ([http://lexlords.uk my site]) observations, if not the caution note struck by Mukherjea, J. (3) When she came to India in December, 1948, she did so on a temporary permit stating in her application for the Advocates - [https://lexlords.com/articles/ my site] - said permit that she was domiciled in Pakistan and accordingly representing herself to be a Pakistani  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/enforcement-of-securities/ my site]) national.<br><br>Mountague(2) in which it was held, on a construction of the terms of the trust, that the payment of the debts was a condition precedent to the vesting of the interest devised therein. In The Commissioner, Hindu Shirur Mutt[6] (Shirur Mutt) while dealing with the issue of autonomy of a religious denomination to determine what rights and ceremonies are essential according to the tenets of its religion it has been stated that - Under article 26(b), therefore a religious denomination or organization enjoys complete autonomy in the matter of deciding as to what rites and ceremonies are essential according to the tenets of the religion they hold and no outside authority has any jurisdiction to interfere with their decision in such matters.<br><br>(5) She made an attempt to obtain a permit for permanent return to India only after steps had been taken to vest the property in the Custodian and after the same was taken possession of. The learned Judges of the High Court relied on illustration (v) to s. Coupled with the above is the lack of easy availability of established works and the declining numbers of acknowledged and undisputed scholars on the subject. 19 of the Transfer of Property Act and s. 119 and 120 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.<br><br>But we must hasten to clarify that no such view of the Court can be understood to an indication of any bar to judicial determination of the issue as and when it arises. 119 of the Indian Succession Act clearly indicate that if "a contrary intention appears" from the document that will prevail. Even if therefore article 5 can be said to be applicable to her on the assumption that Captain Narayan Singh was her husband and that her domicile was that of her husband, the facts bring her case under article 7.<br><br>Article 7 clearly overrides article 5. 19 and 21 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and ss. There is a proviso to this article which will be noticed presently. The exclusion of all outside authorities from deciding what is an essential religion practice must be viewed in the context of the limited role of the State in matters relating to religious freedom as envisaged by Articles 25 and 26 itself and not of the Courts as the arbiter of Constitutional rights and principles. There can be no doubt on these facts that she must be held to have migrated from the territory of India after the 1st March, 1947.<br><br>, of the wife migrating to Pakistan leaving her husband in India. , that " in spite of a clause requiring payment of debts before the property reaches the hands of the donee, the gift is a vested one. " He drew our attention to the fact that both s. There may be a contract of sale between one part-owner and another. 119 of the Indian Succession Act and the decision in Ranganatha Mudaliar v.
+
According to the plaintiff, the second wife i. , (as he then was) are particularly apposite to the present discussion : The  Advocates ([http://nrillegalservices.com the full report]) following observations of Mukherjea J. 1731 of 2013 before the High Court challenging the said order, and the High Court had stayed the same. 55 of the 1930 Classification Rules and r. 3 of the 1955 Rules and r. pass any order and/or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper of the facts of the case. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (1), and it was held therein that it embraced not merely matters of doctrine and belief pertaining to the religion but also the practice of it, or to put, it in terms of Hindu theology, not merely its Gnana but also its Bakti and Karma Kandas.<br><br>The said application was rejected by the learned trial judge vide order dated 18. (3) On the finding that the Sri Venkataramana Temple at Moolky is a denominational institution Advocates ([http://slachd.com/articles/ the full report]) founded for the benefit of the Gowda Saraswath Brahmins, the question arises whether the appellants are entitled to exclude other communities from entering into it for worship on the ground that it is a matter of religion within the protection of Art. The said order was assailed before this Court in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.<br><br>Now, the precise connotation of the expression "matters of religion " came up for consideration by this Court Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/transfer-of-property/ the full report]) in The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. 19 to 23 and the application was allowed. Rule 13 of these Rules corresponds to r. It is argued by the learned Solicitor-General that exclusion of persons from entering into a temple cannot ipso facto be regarded as a matter of religion, that whether it is so must depend on the tenets of the particular religion which the institution in question represents, and that there was no such proof in the present case.<br><br>IRC, (1971) 1 All ER 179 (PC), the Privy Council held that the object of the construction of a statute being to ascertain the will of the legislature it may be presumed that neither injustice nor absurdity was intended. It would be anomalous to bold that a man who has been guilty of misconduct Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/restitution-of-conjugal-rights/ the full report]) should have greater protection than a blameless individual. The specific case pleaded by the plaintiff in the suit was that the plaintiffs father, Hari Shankar Vidyarthi, died on 14. 2 of the said application, list of documents[6] is given.<br><br>The facts which are essential to be stated are that the 2nd respondent faced trial for the offences mentioned hereinbefore in Sessions Case No. 1971 but it was submitted that in proceedings initiated by Tehsildar under Section 7 of the Act, an order of eviction was passed against the alienee and that the alienee was evicted from the land on 24. The newly arraigned accused preferred Special Criminal Application No. Savitri Vidyarthi (first wife) and Rama Vidyarthi (second wife).<br><br>All the defendants filed common written statement. United India Insurance Co. 15 substantially reproduces r. 1955 leaving behind his two widows i. As the factual matrix would exposit, the informant filed another application under Section 319 CrPC after the examination of the prosecution witnesses Nos. [2], wherein it was held as under: Aggrieved of the order of the District Forum, the respondent Company preferred an appeal before the State Commission urging various grounds.<br><br>The said application was dismissed by the Joint Registrar by his order dated 06. The prosecution case is that in furtherance of the Grow More Food Scheme initiated by Government it was decided to subsidize the supply of oil cake to agriculturists with a view to augmenting the production of food crops. 2011 rejected the same. Were it otherwise, the blameless man against whom no fault can be found would be at a disadvantage. It was not disputed that there was alienation in favour of the predecessor of the plaintiff on 28.<br><br>2013 with the observation that it would be open to the informant to file an appropriate application under Section 319 CrPC, if at the end of the examination of all the witnesses, some material is found to connect the person sought to be arraigned as an accused in the alleged crime. It was thus submitted that on re-grant in favour of Muni Papanna, the benefit must accrue to the heirs of said Papanna alone and that the plaintiff had no right, title or interest in land in question.<br><br>The State Commission placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills (P) Ltd. 209 shall hereinafter be referred to Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/rights-of-way/ look at this web-site]) as the approver. But any man who is visited with evil consequences that would not ensue in the case of another similarly placed, but free from blame, can, in my opinion, claim the protection of Art. Aggrieved by the aforesaid rejection, the informant preferred Special Criminal Application No. 1444 of 2006 before the High Court which vide order dated 02.<br><br>17262 of 2012 which was dismissed on 11. 49 of the 1930 Classification Rules, and r. To my mind, the test must always be whether evil consequences over and above those that would ensue from a " contractual termination " are likely to follow. If therefore a literal interpretation would produce such a result, and the language admits of an interpretation which would avoid it, then such an interpretation may be adopted. After examination of 18 prosecution witnesses, the informant preferred an application under Section 319 CrPC for arraigning one Natubhai Maganbhai Edanwala as an accused in the sessions case.

Latest revision as of 15:17, 29 October 2018

According to the plaintiff, the second wife i. , (as he then was) are particularly apposite to the present discussion : The Advocates (the full report) following observations of Mukherjea J. 1731 of 2013 before the High Court challenging the said order, and the High Court had stayed the same. 55 of the 1930 Classification Rules and r. 3 of the 1955 Rules and r. pass any order and/or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper of the facts of the case. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (1), and it was held therein that it embraced not merely matters of doctrine and belief pertaining to the religion but also the practice of it, or to put, it in terms of Hindu theology, not merely its Gnana but also its Bakti and Karma Kandas.

The said application was rejected by the learned trial judge vide order dated 18. (3) On the finding that the Sri Venkataramana Temple at Moolky is a denominational institution Advocates (the full report) founded for the benefit of the Gowda Saraswath Brahmins, the question arises whether the appellants are entitled to exclude other communities from entering into it for worship on the ground that it is a matter of religion within the protection of Art. The said order was assailed before this Court in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.

Now, the precise connotation of the expression "matters of religion " came up for consideration by this Court Advocates (the full report) in The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. 19 to 23 and the application was allowed. Rule 13 of these Rules corresponds to r. It is argued by the learned Solicitor-General that exclusion of persons from entering into a temple cannot ipso facto be regarded as a matter of religion, that whether it is so must depend on the tenets of the particular religion which the institution in question represents, and that there was no such proof in the present case.

IRC, (1971) 1 All ER 179 (PC), the Privy Council held that the object of the construction of a statute being to ascertain the will of the legislature it may be presumed that neither injustice nor absurdity was intended. It would be anomalous to bold that a man who has been guilty of misconduct Advocates (the full report) should have greater protection than a blameless individual. The specific case pleaded by the plaintiff in the suit was that the plaintiffs father, Hari Shankar Vidyarthi, died on 14. 2 of the said application, list of documents[6] is given.

The facts which are essential to be stated are that the 2nd respondent faced trial for the offences mentioned hereinbefore in Sessions Case No. 1971 but it was submitted that in proceedings initiated by Tehsildar under Section 7 of the Act, an order of eviction was passed against the alienee and that the alienee was evicted from the land on 24. The newly arraigned accused preferred Special Criminal Application No. Savitri Vidyarthi (first wife) and Rama Vidyarthi (second wife).

All the defendants filed common written statement. United India Insurance Co. 15 substantially reproduces r. 1955 leaving behind his two widows i. As the factual matrix would exposit, the informant filed another application under Section 319 CrPC after the examination of the prosecution witnesses Nos. [2], wherein it was held as under: Aggrieved of the order of the District Forum, the respondent Company preferred an appeal before the State Commission urging various grounds.

The said application was dismissed by the Joint Registrar by his order dated 06. The prosecution case is that in furtherance of the Grow More Food Scheme initiated by Government it was decided to subsidize the supply of oil cake to agriculturists with a view to augmenting the production of food crops. 2011 rejected the same. Were it otherwise, the blameless man against whom no fault can be found would be at a disadvantage. It was not disputed that there was alienation in favour of the predecessor of the plaintiff on 28.

2013 with the observation that it would be open to the informant to file an appropriate application under Section 319 CrPC, if at the end of the examination of all the witnesses, some material is found to connect the person sought to be arraigned as an accused in the alleged crime. It was thus submitted that on re-grant in favour of Muni Papanna, the benefit must accrue to the heirs of said Papanna alone and that the plaintiff had no right, title or interest in land in question.

The State Commission placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills (P) Ltd. 209 shall hereinafter be referred to Advocates (look at this web-site) as the approver. But any man who is visited with evil consequences that would not ensue in the case of another similarly placed, but free from blame, can, in my opinion, claim the protection of Art. Aggrieved by the aforesaid rejection, the informant preferred Special Criminal Application No. 1444 of 2006 before the High Court which vide order dated 02.

17262 of 2012 which was dismissed on 11. 49 of the 1930 Classification Rules, and r. To my mind, the test must always be whether evil consequences over and above those that would ensue from a " contractual termination " are likely to follow. If therefore a literal interpretation would produce such a result, and the language admits of an interpretation which would avoid it, then such an interpretation may be adopted. After examination of 18 prosecution witnesses, the informant preferred an application under Section 319 CrPC for arraigning one Natubhai Maganbhai Edanwala as an accused in the sessions case.

Retrieved from "http://kb.digimat.in/index.php?title=The_Lawyer_In_Chandigarh_Diaries&oldid=187535"