The Lawyer In Chandigarh Diaries

According to the plaintiff, the second wife i. , (as he then was) are particularly apposite to the present discussion : The Advocates (the full report) following observations of Mukherjea J. 1731 of 2013 before the High Court challenging the said order, and the High Court had stayed the same. 55 of the 1930 Classification Rules and r. 3 of the 1955 Rules and r. pass any order and/or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper of the facts of the case. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (1), and it was held therein that it embraced not merely matters of doctrine and belief pertaining to the religion but also the practice of it, or to put, it in terms of Hindu theology, not merely its Gnana but also its Bakti and Karma Kandas.

The said application was rejected by the learned trial judge vide order dated 18. (3) On the finding that the Sri Venkataramana Temple at Moolky is a denominational institution Advocates (the full report) founded for the benefit of the Gowda Saraswath Brahmins, the question arises whether the appellants are entitled to exclude other communities from entering into it for worship on the ground that it is a matter of religion within the protection of Art. The said order was assailed before this Court in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.

Now, the precise connotation of the expression "matters of religion " came up for consideration by this Court Advocates (the full report) in The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. 19 to 23 and the application was allowed. Rule 13 of these Rules corresponds to r. It is argued by the learned Solicitor-General that exclusion of persons from entering into a temple cannot ipso facto be regarded as a matter of religion, that whether it is so must depend on the tenets of the particular religion which the institution in question represents, and that there was no such proof in the present case.

IRC, (1971) 1 All ER 179 (PC), the Privy Council held that the object of the construction of a statute being to ascertain the will of the legislature it may be presumed that neither injustice nor absurdity was intended. It would be anomalous to bold that a man who has been guilty of misconduct Advocates (the full report) should have greater protection than a blameless individual. The specific case pleaded by the plaintiff in the suit was that the plaintiffs father, Hari Shankar Vidyarthi, died on 14. 2 of the said application, list of documents[6] is given.

The facts which are essential to be stated are that the 2nd respondent faced trial for the offences mentioned hereinbefore in Sessions Case No. 1971 but it was submitted that in proceedings initiated by Tehsildar under Section 7 of the Act, an order of eviction was passed against the alienee and that the alienee was evicted from the land on 24. The newly arraigned accused preferred Special Criminal Application No. Savitri Vidyarthi (first wife) and Rama Vidyarthi (second wife).

All the defendants filed common written statement. United India Insurance Co. 15 substantially reproduces r. 1955 leaving behind his two widows i. As the factual matrix would exposit, the informant filed another application under Section 319 CrPC after the examination of the prosecution witnesses Nos. [2], wherein it was held as under: Aggrieved of the order of the District Forum, the respondent Company preferred an appeal before the State Commission urging various grounds.

The said application was dismissed by the Joint Registrar by his order dated 06. The prosecution case is that in furtherance of the Grow More Food Scheme initiated by Government it was decided to subsidize the supply of oil cake to agriculturists with a view to augmenting the production of food crops. 2011 rejected the same. Were it otherwise, the blameless man against whom no fault can be found would be at a disadvantage. It was not disputed that there was alienation in favour of the predecessor of the plaintiff on 28.

2013 with the observation that it would be open to the informant to file an appropriate application under Section 319 CrPC, if at the end of the examination of all the witnesses, some material is found to connect the person sought to be arraigned as an accused in the alleged crime. It was thus submitted that on re-grant in favour of Muni Papanna, the benefit must accrue to the heirs of said Papanna alone and that the plaintiff had no right, title or interest in land in question.

The State Commission placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills (P) Ltd. 209 shall hereinafter be referred to Advocates (look at this web-site) as the approver. But any man who is visited with evil consequences that would not ensue in the case of another similarly placed, but free from blame, can, in my opinion, claim the protection of Art. Aggrieved by the aforesaid rejection, the informant preferred Special Criminal Application No. 1444 of 2006 before the High Court which vide order dated 02.

17262 of 2012 which was dismissed on 11. 49 of the 1930 Classification Rules, and r. To my mind, the test must always be whether evil consequences over and above those that would ensue from a " contractual termination " are likely to follow. If therefore a literal interpretation would produce such a result, and the language admits of an interpretation which would avoid it, then such an interpretation may be adopted. After examination of 18 prosecution witnesses, the informant preferred an application under Section 319 CrPC for arraigning one Natubhai Maganbhai Edanwala as an accused in the sessions case.