Little Known Facts About Lawyer In Chandigarh.

'It is, in Advocates (continued) my opinion, clear that the Act Advocates (continued) does not contemplate or provide for Advocates (continued) the acquisition of any interest which already belongs to Government in land which is being acquired under the Act, but only for the acquisition of such interests in the land Advocates (continued) Advocates (click here.) as do not already belong to the Government". A Pai Foundation (supra) , this court held that Article 19(1)(g) employs four expressions viz. (emphasis supplied) (at Paras 9 and 10) 33 and 33-A inserted in the Industrial Di-- putes Act 1947 (XIV of 1947) by Act XLVIII of 1950 confer distinct benefits on the workmen and give some additional jurisdiction and power to the authorities mentioned therein.

[9] The amplitude of the term ˜occupation is limited by the economic imperative of livelihood generation. This was followed up by a representation dated 10. 1046) on the ground that legislation in so far as it authorised the framing of a scheme by the Commissioner along with his associates and declared such determination as final without any scope for correction thereof by judicial intervention was an unrea- sonable restriction on the right of the head of the Math as respects his interest in the Math which is a, right to bold property within the meaning of Art.

2004 in which the appellant company stated:- The company, although did not engage any mathadi workmen, in view of the prosecution, registered itself on 11/10/1996, and was issued Registration No. Article 19(1)(g) uses the four expressions so as to cover all activities of a citizen in respect of which income or profit is generated, and which can consequently be regulated under Article 19(1)(6). The Company submits that no Toli was allotted to it in spite of being registered till 21/3/2001, as the Board was well aware that the Company itself did not engage any persons for loading trucks and that the truckers/customers engaged persons from the Societies for loading work.

The State of Orissa ([1954] S. profession, occupation, trade and business. Therefore, all the activities contemplated under Article 19(1)(g) are essentially activities which enable a citizen to generate economic benefits. 2002 between the appellant and the respondent. Where capital is subscribed by the issue of shares under section 23 of the Act provision is made for the representation of the share-holders in the Corporation and the manner in which they are to be elected in accordance with rules to be framed under the Act.

The Corporation consists of a Chairman and members appointed by the State Government who are removable by that authority. The Statement of Objects and Reasons further mentions that after holding series of meetings with the representatives of the interests affected by the proposed legislation and after considering all these suggestions and examining the recommendations of the Committee, Government had decided to bring the Bill which seeks to regulate the employment of mathadis, hamals and other manual workers employed in certain employments, to make better provision for their terms and conditions of employment, to provide for their welfare, for health and safety measures, where such employments require those measures, to make provision for ensuring an adequate supply to, and full and proper utilization of such workers in such employments, to prevent avoidable unemployment and for such purposes to provide for the establishment of Boards in respect of these employments and (where necessary) in the different areas of the State and to provide for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid.

Sections 38 and 39 of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1939 (Orissa Act IV of 1939) as amended by Orissa Act XVIII of 1953 were declared unconstitutional and void by the Supreme Court in Mahant Sri Jagannath Bamanuj Das v. almost 7 years after the appellant company had been registered as an employer under the 1969 Act, the appellant company applied to remove its name from the register contained in the 1969 Act. After registration, the Company with a view to close the matter pleaded guilty in the proceedings filed by the Board before the Labour Court.

Accordingly, we find no error in the view taken by the High Court that the applications filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Indian Act are not maintainable against the two foreign awards dated 10. Its Chief Executive Officer or General Manager and its Chief Accounts Officer are to be appointed by the State Government. 19(1)(f) of the Constitution. The other officers and servants are to be appointed by the Corporation but the conditions of appointment and service and the scales of pay shall be determined by regulations made under the Act subject to the provisions of section 34, which authorises the State Government to issue directions and general instructions to the Corporation and these instructions may include directions relating to the recruitment and conditions of service.

The primary purpose and thrust of Article 19(1)(g) is to generate economic benefit and to protect the fruits of ones labour.