Difference between revisions of "Facts About Lawyer In Chandigarh Revealed"

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Manning(2), The Queen Advocates ([http://lawyerchandigarh.com/how-non-resident-indian-can-end-his-criminal-case/ visit the site]) v. Ganguli, prosecution witness No. The seco...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Manning(2), The Queen Advocates ([http://lawyerchandigarh.com/how-non-resident-indian-can-end-his-criminal-case/ visit the site]) v. Ganguli, prosecution witness No. The second ground on which, in our opinion, the appeal must succeed, is based on the findings of the High Court itself This case involved a consideration of a large volume of documentary evidence almost all in English. -ThiS appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute between the appellant M/s. Their permits continue for the normal period and the considerations which are laid down in clauses (f) and (g) which have been thereby added to sections 47 and 55 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, would come into 40 play when these permits which have expired by lapse of time come to be considered for renewal on applications made by permit holders in that behalf.<br><br>In support of the first contention raised on behalf of the appellant strong reliance was placed on the 213 recent decision of this Court in Topan Das v. Rose Valley by making public issue of debentures during the period between 2001-2002 to 2007-2008, without complying with the public issue norms, violated the provisions of erstwhile SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 and the provisions of Section 117(A) of the Companies Act, 1956 and other provisions of SEBI Act which is a Scheduled Offence under PMLA.<br><br>225 lakhs from 2585 persons by issuing secured debentures to the general public without complying with the norms related to IPO of securities as per first provision to Section 67(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. The learned adjudicator considered the pleas raised, and the evidence led, by the parties before him, investigated into the financial position of the appellant and pronounced his award on October 9, 1953, on all matters referred to him. The cases, The Queen v. Further, on perusal of various offences listed in the Schedule in 28 Paragraphs, it could be seen that only penal provisions of the Statutes have been incorporated in the Schedule.<br><br>The following Judgment of the Court was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR J. He was neither armed with some authority or representative character nor were his duties immediately auxiliary to those of some one who was so armed. From the information provided by ROC, it was observed that Rose Valley had raised a total sum of Rs. By their order dated July 31, 1952, the Government of West Bengal referred thirteen matters for adjudication to Shri S. He was not employed to exercise to some extent and in certain circumstances the delegated function of Government and, therefore, was not an "officer" within the meaning of that term as used in section 21(9), Indian Penal Code.<br><br>10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Provided further that the licensing authority shall not issue a new driving licence to the applicant, if he had previously held a driving licence, unless it is satisfied that there is good and sufficient reason for his inability to obtain a duplicate copy of his former licence. The two positions, therefore, are not similar and the permit holders under Orissa Act I of 1949 do not fall in the same class or group as the permit holders under Orissa Act XXXVI of 1947.<br><br>The High  Advocates ([http://slachd.com/can-my-spouse-be-forced-to-sign-the-settlement-agreement/ more bonuses]) Court had made the following observations as to the nature of the case and the requisite qualifications of the members of the jury necessary for a proper under. State of Bombay(1) and the rulings relied upon in that case. There is no denying the fact that Section 24 of the SEBI Act is a penal provision of inclusive nature and thus it clearly reflects the legislative intent of a scheduled offence under PMLA.<br><br>Thompson(3) and The King v. The complaint reveals that SEBI received a letter from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Office of the Registrar of Companies ("ROC"), West Bengal, with reference to Rose Valley in which the ROC had stated that Rose Valley has repeatedly issued debentures in the years 2001-2002, 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2007- 2008 to more than 49 persons in each financial year without filing offer documents with either the ROC or the SEBI and requested SEBI to investigate into the matter.<br><br>These permits may or may not be renewed in favour of these permit holders but the non- renewal of such permits would not be on a par with the premature termination or cancellation of the permits held by the owners of stage carriage services to whom the provisions of Orissa Act XXXVI of 1947 were applied. 26 -Agent of the Bank-was examined at great length, and be gave his evidence on 12 days between October and December, 1949, It runs into about 45 typed pages.<br><br>This 645 evidence appears to have been given by him in English because he put in an application that he had given the evidence in English and that he was not in a position to say  Advocates ([http://nrilegalservices.me/how-can-nri-settle-finances-during-divorce/ visit the site]) whether the Hindi version as recorded by the deposition- writer was the correct version, as he was not familiar with Hindi. Niyogi who was appointed to constitute the Sixth Industrial Tribunal for adjudication under s. Admittedly, the complaint was filed by SEBI against the appellant on the allegation of committing offence punishable under Section 4 of PMLA.<br><br>The fact remains that Section 24 of Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/disputes-between-co-sharers/ visit the site]) the SEBI Act is inclusive in nature and also includes Section 12A within its ambit and scope. If he was thus not an officer of the Government, he could not be a public servant within the meaning of section 21, Indian Penal Code nor could he be a public servant for the purposes of Act 11 of 1947 and could not be convicted of the offence under section 5(1)(d) of Act II of 1947. The Bill inter alia provides for (a) modification and amplification of certain definitions of new type of vehicles ; Therefore, the proposed legislation has been prepared in the light of the above background.<br><br>Plummer(4) were cited in support of the contention that where all the accused persons except one are acquitted on a charge of conspiracy, the conviction of one only on that charge cannot Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/company-incorporation-and-llp/ visit the site]) be sustained. The oral evidence was directed mainly to connect those documents and to explain their bearing on the charges framed against the accused, of criminal breach of trust and falsification of relevant accounts and entries in the registers maintained by the Bank.<br><br>In this connection the recent decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the case of Kannangara Aratchige Dharmasena v. In these circumstances, we have to note that the evidence of the two Civil Surgeons and that of the auditor would be the foundation for the case against the appellant and that being the case, it seems to us that they ought to have been examined in court. , and its Workmen represented by Bengal Aluminium Workers' Union.<br><br>Crown Aluminium Works, Belur, represented by Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd.
+
The respondents ,understood this position quite correctly, and with 564 view to bring themselves within section 23, they alleged that the lay off was not bona. As Advocates ([http://lawyerchandigarh.com/category/nri-legal-services/ basics]) it has not been contended that the appellant had not received the notice, and it is common ground that the appellant had not carried out the terms of the notice, there cannot be the least doubt that the appellant has incurred the penalty under s. Attempt by the defendants/respondents to establish otherwise has been found to be totally non-acceptable to the trial court as well as the first  Advocates - [https://lexlords.com/nri-legal-services/ basics], appellate court.<br><br>This contention rests on the supposition that the conditions under which workmen could be laid off are conditions  Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/mediation/ basics]) as to their service, 'and that when the employer lays off workmen without proper grounds therefor, it is a violation of the- conditions of service within section 22(a) of the Act. 1956 42 The Securities In section 2 in clause (h) Contracts after sub-clause (ib) (Regulation) Act insert the following:-- " 1956 (ic) security receipt as defined in clause (zg) of section 2 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002".<br><br>where there is an express saving, there must be an express exclusion. It is the substance and not the form of the notice that has to be regarded. In the case before us, there is clear and cogent evidence on the side of the plaintiff/appellant that there has been structural alteration in the premises rented out to the respondents without his consent. The present Section 100-A was amended in 2002. This being the position, it must be held that the High Court was not justified in reversing the finding of fact recorded by the first appellate court on the issues of existence of landlord-tenant relationship between the plaintiff and  Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/maintenance/ get more info]) the defendant and default committed by the latter in payment of rent.<br><br>The effective part of the notice quoted above, leaves no doubt in the mind of the parties concerned that the requisition is to remove the encroachment caused by the compound wall. 488(1)(c), read with s. THE SCHEDULE (Section 41) Year Act No. 1986 1 The Sick In section 15 in Industrial sub-section (1) after the Companies (Specialproviso insert the Provisions) Act following:-- "PROVIDED 1985 FURTHER that no reference shall be made to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 where financial assets have been acquired by any securitisation company or reconstruction company under sub-section (1) of section 5 of that Act: PROVIDED ALSO that on or after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 where a reference is pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction such reference shall abate if the secured creditors representing not less than three-fourth in value of the amount outstanding against financial assistance disbursed to the borrower of such secured creditors have taken any measures to recover their secured debt under sub-section (4) of section 13 of that Act.<br><br> As stated hereinabove, a specific exclusion may be clear from the words of a statute even though no specific reference is made to Letters Patent. It is settled law that in exercise of power under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court cannot interfere with the finding of fact recorded by the first appellate court which is the final court of fact, unless the same is found to be perverse. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the proposition contained in sub-section (1), nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect any remedy which a landholder or landlord may have under any law for the time being in force for the recovery of rent of agricultural land from the produce of such land.<br><br> The appellant was bound to carry out the terms of the requisition, and as he admittedly failed therein, he had incurred the penalty of the law. Sub-section (2) of Section 104 does not provide for any express exclusion. ' fide, inasmuch as, in fact, groundnut and neem seeds were available. It must, therefore, be held that notwithstanding the label given to the notice, the requisition bad been lawfully made in the sense that the appellant had made the encroachment complained of, and that the Municipality was entitled to call upon him to remove the encroachment.<br><br> On the first question, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to grant relief under section 23 of the Act arises only if it is made out that there was contravention of section 22 by the management. In this context reference may be made to Section 100-A. Amendments of certain enactments The enactments specified in the Schedule shall be amended in the manner specified therein. But where there is an express saving in the statute/section itself, then general words to the effect that an appeal would not lie or order will be final are not sufficient.<br><br> Short title Amendment 1956 1 The Companies Act In section 4A in 1956 sub-section (1) after clause (vi) insert the following:-- "(vii) the securitisation company or the reconstruction company which has obtained a certificate of registration under sub-section (4) of section 3 of  Advocates ([http://lawyerchandigarh.com/contact/ basics]) the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002". In order to better implement the provisions of this Act, Section 32 also contains a non obstante clause overriding all other laws including Memoranda and Articles of Association of the industrial company or any other instrument having effect by virtue of any other law, except the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

Revision as of 17:47, 26 October 2018

The respondents ,understood this position quite correctly, and with 564 view to bring themselves within section 23, they alleged that the lay off was not bona. As Advocates (basics) it has not been contended that the appellant had not received the notice, and it is common ground that the appellant had not carried out the terms of the notice, there cannot be the least doubt that the appellant has incurred the penalty under s. Attempt by the defendants/respondents to establish otherwise has been found to be totally non-acceptable to the trial court as well as the first Advocates - basics, appellate court.

This contention rests on the supposition that the conditions under which workmen could be laid off are conditions Advocates (basics) as to their service, 'and that when the employer lays off workmen without proper grounds therefor, it is a violation of the- conditions of service within section 22(a) of the Act. 1956 42 The Securities In section 2 in clause (h) Contracts after sub-clause (ib) (Regulation) Act insert the following:-- " 1956 (ic) security receipt as defined in clause (zg) of section 2 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002".

where there is an express saving, there must be an express exclusion. It is the substance and not the form of the notice that has to be regarded. In the case before us, there is clear and cogent evidence on the side of the plaintiff/appellant that there has been structural alteration in the premises rented out to the respondents without his consent. The present Section 100-A was amended in 2002. This being the position, it must be held that the High Court was not justified in reversing the finding of fact recorded by the first appellate court on the issues of existence of landlord-tenant relationship between the plaintiff and Advocates (get more info) the defendant and default committed by the latter in payment of rent.

The effective part of the notice quoted above, leaves no doubt in the mind of the parties concerned that the requisition is to remove the encroachment caused by the compound wall. 488(1)(c), read with s. THE SCHEDULE (Section 41) Year Act No. 1986 1 The Sick In section 15 in Industrial sub-section (1) after the Companies (Specialproviso insert the Provisions) Act following:-- "PROVIDED 1985 FURTHER that no reference shall be made to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 where financial assets have been acquired by any securitisation company or reconstruction company under sub-section (1) of section 5 of that Act: PROVIDED ALSO that on or after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 where a reference is pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction such reference shall abate if the secured creditors representing not less than three-fourth in value of the amount outstanding against financial assistance disbursed to the borrower of such secured creditors have taken any measures to recover their secured debt under sub-section (4) of section 13 of that Act.

As stated hereinabove, a specific exclusion may be clear from the words of a statute even though no specific reference is made to Letters Patent. It is settled law that in exercise of power under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court cannot interfere with the finding of fact recorded by the first appellate court which is the final court of fact, unless the same is found to be perverse. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the proposition contained in sub-section (1), nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect any remedy which a landholder or landlord may have under any law for the time being in force for the recovery of rent of agricultural land from the produce of such land.

The appellant was bound to carry out the terms of the requisition, and as he admittedly failed therein, he had incurred the penalty of the law. Sub-section (2) of Section 104 does not provide for any express exclusion. ' fide, inasmuch as, in fact, groundnut and neem seeds were available. It must, therefore, be held that notwithstanding the label given to the notice, the requisition bad been lawfully made in the sense that the appellant had made the encroachment complained of, and that the Municipality was entitled to call upon him to remove the encroachment.

On the first question, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to grant relief under section 23 of the Act arises only if it is made out that there was contravention of section 22 by the management. In this context reference may be made to Section 100-A. Amendments of certain enactments The enactments specified in the Schedule shall be amended in the manner specified therein. But where there is an express saving in the statute/section itself, then general words to the effect that an appeal would not lie or order will be final are not sufficient.

Short title Amendment 1956 1 The Companies Act In section 4A in 1956 sub-section (1) after clause (vi) insert the following:-- "(vii) the securitisation company or the reconstruction company which has obtained a certificate of registration under sub-section (4) of section 3 of Advocates (basics) the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002". In order to better implement the provisions of this Act, Section 32 also contains a non obstante clause overriding all other laws including Memoranda and Articles of Association of the industrial company or any other instrument having effect by virtue of any other law, except the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 and The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.