Difference between revisions of "The Definitive Guide To Lawyer In Chandigarh"

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The respondent filed a petition under Art. 4 of 1925- 26 under the very sale deed dated 30-1-1920, which forms the root of the appellants' title. Keeping in view the terms and...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The respondent filed a petition under Art. 4 of 1925- 26 under the very sale deed dated 30-1-1920, which forms the root of the appellants' title. Keeping in view the terms and language and the legislative history of the section 66(1) we are unable to enlarge the terms of the section by mere construction so as to include within its operation goods which are in transit and are being transported across the jurisdictional limits of the Municipality.<br><br>In view of the above,the criticism of Mr. The High Court accepted these contentions and quashed the proceedings taken under the 1948 Act: In 1951 the respondents evicted certain tenants. Emperor(2), Lord Simonds observed: 2011, the order of ad-interim injunction was maintained but the trial court was directed to decide the application for injunction on its own merits within Advocates ([http://lawyerchandigarh.com/who-can-seek-maintenance-under-section-125-of-the-crpc/ additional info]) a period of one month.<br><br>It was finally contended that the purchase by Devamma in execution of the decree in 0. It should be noted, however, that in Advocates ([http://nrilegalservices.me/what-to-know-before-signing-a-rent-agreement/ that site]) this Calcutta case the decree was obtained and the transfer was made on the same day and it was held that though there was no assignment of the decree in so many words the property with all arrears of rent having been assigned to the mortgagee simultaneously with the passing of the decree the  Advocates - [http://nrilegalservices.me/duties-of-a-civil-lawyer-in-property-disputes-of-nri/ additional info] - assignment Advocates ([http://acquitlaw.com/anticipatory-bail/ additional info]) passed the decree also.<br><br>While commending thus the conduct of the Transport Minister and the Chief Minister of the Punjab Government, we cannot help observing that the step (1) [ [1862] EngR 201; 1862] 3 F. Umrigar for the appellants that the judgment under appeal proceeds on a ground which was, not merely, not in the contemplation of the authorities When they passed the orders in question, but was not even raised in the pleadings in Court, is not without substance.<br><br>The tenants applied to the Revenue Officer under the 1948 Act for being restored to possession on the allegations that the respondent was their landlord and that he had unlawfully evicted them. Vatllabdas Wallji (supra). Nanjunda Rao and his successors under the sale deed dated 30-1-1920 continued to subsist, notwithstanding the court auction sale on 2-8-1928. 363 Of the Constitution barred the Court from dealing with any dispute arising out of the Agreement, and (3) that the 1948 Act did not apply to him as he was not a landlord.<br><br>148 of the Railway Establishment Code. 15 of the Wages Act, or the provisions of the Limitation Act. The obvious answer to this contention is that the properties which were sold on 2-8-1928 did not vest in the Official Receiver on the making of the order of adjudication on 19-2- 1926. In this view, it must be held that the provisions of the impugned Act are unconstitutional, in that they take away the property of the appellant in violation of either Art. " It should be added that while the appellants stated in their petitions that action had been taken against them under the Security Rules, and that those rules were ultra vires, the respondents did not plead that 1059 action was taken under R.<br><br> They only contended that the Security Rules were valid. Con/T/2 I /MP/82 dated 6-7-1950 and am of the opinion that you are engaged and associated with others in subversive activities in such mariner as to raise doubts about your reliability and am satisfied that your retention in public service is prejudicial to national security. The Nagar Panchayat in its turn approached the High Court with a writ petition in which by order dated 9.<br><br> 31 (2) of the Constitution. Promotha Nath Ganguli(1) follows the decision of the Bombay High Court in Purmananddas Jivandas v. On the question whether sanction was necessary under section 197(1) it was held by the Privy Council that there was no difference in scope between that section and section 270 of the Government of India Act, 1935, and approving the statement of the law by Varadachariar, J. 100 of 1919-20 was void and conferred no title on her, because the Official Receiver in whom the estate of Keshavananda, the mortgagor, had vested on his adjudication as insolvent on 19-2-1926 had not been made a party to those proceedings, and that, in conse- quence, the title of Dr.<br><br> That sale was no doubt pendente lite, but the effect of section 52 is not to wipe it out altogether but to subordinate it to the rights based. The Revenue Officer allowed the applications and directed restoration of possession. , as they had been transferred by the mortgagor, long prior to the presentation of Insolvency Case No. The respondent was the Ruler of the erstwhile State of Khandapara which merged in the State of Orissa on August 1, 1949. The case of Ananda Mohon Roy v.<br><br> We are therefore of opinion that even if the matter is governed by s. "I have considered your representation to me in reply to this office letter No. Article 3 of the Agreement of Merger guaranteed that "the Raja shall be entitled to full ownership, use and enjoyment of all his private properties". 56 of the Contract Act, the employer is no more discharged than by the operation of the bar of limitation under s. [1862] EngR 201; 176 E. 226 of the Constitution in the High Court for quashing the orders of the Revenue Officer contending, (1) that the application of the provisions of the 1948 Act to his private properties violated the guarantee given under the Agreement, (2) that Art.<br><br>The Orissa Merged States' (Laws) Act, 1950 extended the Orissa Tenant's Protection Act, 1948 to the merged areas. I have decided with the prior approval of the President that your services should be terminated under Rule 3 of the Railway Services (Safeguarding of National Security) Rules, 1949.
+
86 hectares for commercial purposes, subject to the general provisions of the Regulation, 1966 and the Rules made thereunder. Mukul Rohatgi, the learned Attorney General, appearing on behalf of the Review Petitioners-Appellants urged this Court to consider reviewing the impugned judgment by placing strong reliance upon the lease deed dated 01. The reference to the policy and its terms and conditions may be expressed in the proposal or Advocates, [http://lawyerchandigarh.com/how-punjab-and-haryana-exercises-its-inherent-powers-under-section-482-of-crpc/ find out here], the cover note or even in the letter of  Advocates ([http://nri-world.com find out here]) acceptance including the cover note.<br><br>The learned Attorney General submits that it is a privilege conferred upon Respondent no. Thereis therefore much to be said for the contention ofthe appellants that the proceedings evidenced by Exhibits A-1 and A-1(1) were collusive in character. The entire outlet system upto the individual outlets have been put in place as already stated above. The appellants were called upon thereby, to remove the illegal and unauthorized constructions in violation of the provisions of Act 1965 and Act 1966 within 30 days of the receipt of the notice failing which it was conveyed, that the same would be demolished by the Nagar Panchayat.<br><br>Documents like the proposal, cover note and the policy are commercial documents and to interpret them commercial habits and practice cannot altogether be ignored. It should also be Advocates, [http://acquitlaw.com/ find out here], mentioned that at the hearing of the petition, no evidence was adduced by the mortgagors, and the decision of the Survey Officer was given practically ex parte. (the first respondent herein). The recitals in the lease deed, Exhibit 2(a) which was executed by the defendants of the second party, were inconsistent with their claim that the lands were raiyati.<br><br>30 (2) Of the Ajmer-Merwara Municipalities Regulation, 1925, the electoral roll for the Parliamentary constituency was only treated as the basis for the electoral roll of the Municipality and that the rules in so far as they made no provision for the revision of the electoral roll, for the adjudication of claims to be included therein or for entertaining objections to such inclusion, were defective and, therefore, the electoral roll of the Ajmer Municipality which was authenticated and published by the appellant on August 8, 1955, was not in conformity with the provisions of S.<br><br>Why then did they not produce Exhibits 2 and 3 at the hearing? do execute in favour of the plaintiffs proper deed or deeds of transfer of . When the cover note incorporates the policy in this manner, it does not have to recite the term and conditions, but merely to refer to a particular standard policy. Where a compromise decree provides both for a personal remedy and a charge, the question whether the decree-holder can pursue the personal remedy while reserving the remedy under the charge depends on the intention to be gathered from  Advocates [[http://nriillegalservices.com click here to investigate]] the terms of the decree.<br><br>five annas share in the Marwari Brothers. 30 (2) and the relevant,provisions of the Regulation 69 and could not form the basis of any valid elections to be held to the Ajmer Municipal Committee. 22/3 and 23 measuring 8. The license period was for an initial period of 30 years, with the option of a further renewal for a maximum period of 60 years. 1960, executed in respect of the property covered in the acquisition notifications between Krishi Gopalan Silpa Sikshalaya and M/S Andaman Timber Industries Ltd.<br><br>It directs that "against payment or tender by the plaintiffs. Vacuum and Air are being delayed. The learned Attorney General also placed reliance upon the license deed dated 02. The notice specified that commercial use of land within the said zone was prohibited. If the proposal is for a standard policy and the cover note refers to it, the assured is taken to have accepted the terms of that policy. It was to the interests of the mortgagees that the'lands should be held to be 'sir', and it was further their duty to defend the title of the mortgagors as against the claim made by the tenants that they were raiyati lands.<br><br> I also noticed that at the point of the final outlets at the end of the Branch pipeline at the Bed heads wherever they are specified by the Work Order, the double lockout with parking facility has been installed but the electrical switches for which space is left in the panel has not yet been fixed. The mortgagees were parties to the proceedings, and they did not appear and produce the mortgage deeds, Exhibits 2 and 3, under which they got into possession, and which described the lands as 'sir'.<br><br> 10, Nagar Manmad Road, in violation of the construction line and control line. Further, the said license could be terminated at the will of the Review Petitioners- Appellants. The incorporation of the terms and conditions of the policy may also arise from a combination of references in two or more documents passing between the parties. 1990 executed in Form AG-3 under Sections 146 (ii) and 164 of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation, 1966), by way of which licensing rights were granted to Respondent No.<br><br> Why did they not produce it at the hearing ? 1, and no absolute interest in the land is created by virtue of the said license. 1 in respect of Survey Nos.

Revision as of 03:20, 28 October 2018

86 hectares for commercial purposes, subject to the general provisions of the Regulation, 1966 and the Rules made thereunder. Mukul Rohatgi, the learned Attorney General, appearing on behalf of the Review Petitioners-Appellants urged this Court to consider reviewing the impugned judgment by placing strong reliance upon the lease deed dated 01. The reference to the policy and its terms and conditions may be expressed in the proposal or Advocates, find out here, the cover note or even in the letter of Advocates (find out here) acceptance including the cover note.

The learned Attorney General submits that it is a privilege conferred upon Respondent no. Thereis therefore much to be said for the contention ofthe appellants that the proceedings evidenced by Exhibits A-1 and A-1(1) were collusive in character. The entire outlet system upto the individual outlets have been put in place as already stated above. The appellants were called upon thereby, to remove the illegal and unauthorized constructions in violation of the provisions of Act 1965 and Act 1966 within 30 days of the receipt of the notice failing which it was conveyed, that the same would be demolished by the Nagar Panchayat.

Documents like the proposal, cover note and the policy are commercial documents and to interpret them commercial habits and practice cannot altogether be ignored. It should also be Advocates, find out here, mentioned that at the hearing of the petition, no evidence was adduced by the mortgagors, and the decision of the Survey Officer was given practically ex parte. (the first respondent herein). The recitals in the lease deed, Exhibit 2(a) which was executed by the defendants of the second party, were inconsistent with their claim that the lands were raiyati.

30 (2) Of the Ajmer-Merwara Municipalities Regulation, 1925, the electoral roll for the Parliamentary constituency was only treated as the basis for the electoral roll of the Municipality and that the rules in so far as they made no provision for the revision of the electoral roll, for the adjudication of claims to be included therein or for entertaining objections to such inclusion, were defective and, therefore, the electoral roll of the Ajmer Municipality which was authenticated and published by the appellant on August 8, 1955, was not in conformity with the provisions of S.

Why then did they not produce Exhibits 2 and 3 at the hearing? do execute in favour of the plaintiffs proper deed or deeds of transfer of . When the cover note incorporates the policy in this manner, it does not have to recite the term and conditions, but merely to refer to a particular standard policy. Where a compromise decree provides both for a personal remedy and a charge, the question whether the decree-holder can pursue the personal remedy while reserving the remedy under the charge depends on the intention to be gathered from Advocates [click here to investigate] the terms of the decree.

five annas share in the Marwari Brothers. 30 (2) and the relevant,provisions of the Regulation 69 and could not form the basis of any valid elections to be held to the Ajmer Municipal Committee. 22/3 and 23 measuring 8. The license period was for an initial period of 30 years, with the option of a further renewal for a maximum period of 60 years. 1960, executed in respect of the property covered in the acquisition notifications between Krishi Gopalan Silpa Sikshalaya and M/S Andaman Timber Industries Ltd.

It directs that "against payment or tender by the plaintiffs. Vacuum and Air are being delayed. The learned Attorney General also placed reliance upon the license deed dated 02. The notice specified that commercial use of land within the said zone was prohibited. If the proposal is for a standard policy and the cover note refers to it, the assured is taken to have accepted the terms of that policy. It was to the interests of the mortgagees that the'lands should be held to be 'sir', and it was further their duty to defend the title of the mortgagors as against the claim made by the tenants that they were raiyati lands.

I also noticed that at the point of the final outlets at the end of the Branch pipeline at the Bed heads wherever they are specified by the Work Order, the double lockout with parking facility has been installed but the electrical switches for which space is left in the panel has not yet been fixed. The mortgagees were parties to the proceedings, and they did not appear and produce the mortgage deeds, Exhibits 2 and 3, under which they got into possession, and which described the lands as 'sir'.

10, Nagar Manmad Road, in violation of the construction line and control line. Further, the said license could be terminated at the will of the Review Petitioners- Appellants. The incorporation of the terms and conditions of the policy may also arise from a combination of references in two or more documents passing between the parties. 1990 executed in Form AG-3 under Sections 146 (ii) and 164 of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulation, 1966), by way of which licensing rights were granted to Respondent No.

Why did they not produce it at the hearing ? 1, and no absolute interest in the land is created by virtue of the said license. 1 in respect of Survey Nos.

Retrieved from "http://kb.digimat.in/index.php?title=The_Definitive_Guide_To_Lawyer_In_Chandigarh&oldid=186749"