Everything About Lawyer In Chandigarh

It must be mentioned Advocates (sneak a peek at these guys) that the State of Andhra had come into existence on October 1, 1953, but that the High Court of Madras continued to have jurisdiction over the Andhra Advocates (a cool way to improve) State until July, 1954, when a separate High Court was established therefor. 6 of the Act by a competent authority was on the record. 150 and above could be held only by a Tribunal to which the Government might refer the same, and that, therefore, the proceedings of the High Court of Madras after October 1, 1953, culminating in the order of suspension dated January 28, 1954, were without jurisdiction, and secondly, that the order in question was void, as Advocates; sneak a peek at these guys, it was in contravention of Art.

For the above reasons, we hold that the tribunal has disposed of the appeal before it in a most perfunctory manner without going into any figures at all but by merely on the statement made by counsel and on the basis of material which appears to have been produced first time before the tribunal. As against the judgment of the trial court, the appellant filed an appeal before the High Court being Criminal Appeal No. 209 shall hereinafter be referred to as the approver.

It is also true Advocates (sneak a peek at these guys) that it is not unlawful to be either a Communist or a trade unionist. We hold that the Security Rules are not illegal as being repugnant -to ,a Art. It is admitted that at the time the Special Judges concerned purported to take cognizance the appellants were not public servants and that no order of sanction under s. It can be seen from the above extracted proviso, an undertaking engaged in generation of power has an option to claim depreciation on its assets in accordance with the scheme under Section 32(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act.

Advocates - sneak a peek at these guys, That by the substitution of terminal tax on goods imported into a local area the nature of the tax had not been altered from what it was when octroi was in force or when instead of " terminal tax " octroi (without refund, was substituted is clear from the decision of the Federal Court in Punjab Flour and General Mills' case (2) which is discussed in a later part of (1) [1805] USSC 18; (1804) 2 Cranch 358, 390; [1805] USSC 18; 2 L.

Thus, the provisions of the Act relating to lock-out, strike, lay-off, retrenchment, conciliation and adjudication proceedings, the period during which the awards are to be in force, have meaning only if they refer to an industry which is running and not one which is closed. 311 of the Constitution. The writ petition which was pending in the High Court of Madras was then transferred to the Andhra High Court.

The prosecution case is that in furtherance of the Grow More Food Scheme initiated by Government it was decided to subsidize the supply of oil cake to agriculturists with a view to augmenting the production of food crops. The tribunal to so decide on the material which was placed before the Commissioner and not to allow any additional documents/materials to be filed before it. The notice, it is true, refers to the appellant being a member of the Communist Party and to his activities in the trade union.

None of our observations made herein shall bind the tribunal to which this case is remitted. Such an option could be exercised at the relevant point of time as indicated in the said proviso. This clearly proceeds on the basis that the right to defend himself in the enquiry and the right to make representation against the proposed punishment are all parts of his " statutory right " and are implicit in the reasonable opportunity provided by the statute itself for the protection of the government servant.

But it is not the necessary attribute either of a Communist or a trade unionist that he should indulge in subversive activities, and when action was taken against the appellant under the rules, it was not because he was a 1064 Communist or a trade unionist, but because he was engaged in subversive activities. 46 of 1956 in the notice dated July 6, 1950, that the expression "subversive activities " is wide enough to take in lawful activities as well, and must therefore be held to be unreasonable for purposes of classification under Art.

At the time that the appellants are alleged to have committed the offence they were public servants. We are also unable to agree with the argument of the appellants based on the charges made against the appellant in Civil Appeal No. The High Court examined the facts and re-appreciated the entire evidence adduced from the side of the prosecution and recorded an independent finding and affirmed the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court.

We, therefore, set aside the order of the tribunal and remand the matter back to the tribunal. The tribunal will consider in detail, if necessary, by taking the help of a Cost Accountant and after looking into the accounts of the respondent whether or not the advances or any part thereof have been used in the working capital and whether or not the advances received by the respondent and/or the interest earned thereon have been used in the working capital and/or whether it has the effect of reducing the price of the motorcycle.