Difference between revisions of "5 Essential Elements For Lawyer In Chandigarh"

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The Bill inter alia provides for (a) modification and amplification of certain definitions of new type of vehicles ; Therefore, the proposed legislation has been prepared in t...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The Bill inter alia provides for (a) modification and amplification of certain definitions of new type of vehicles ; Therefore, the proposed legislation has been prepared in the light of the above background. It is the essence of a classification that upon the class are cast duties and burdens different from those resting upon the general public. It cannot be said that such  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/rights-of-way/ her latest blog]) a decision was unfair, mala  Advocates ([https://lexlords.com/succession-certificate/ her latest blog]) fide or based on irrelevant considerations. We grant leave in SLP(C) No.<br><br>The High Court veered away from the main issue and went on to elaborate on the law of arbitration and the mode of setting aside the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, which in our view, was not warranted. In view of the inclusion of Section 34 IPC in the array of offences, for which the respondents-accused had been charged by the trial court, as well as the facts and the evidence sought to be relied upon by the prosecution, in our estimate, the order of remand was not called for and the appeals should Advocates; [http://slachd.com/what-documents-are-required-in-a-divorce-case/ sneak a peek at this web-site.], have been decided on merits, on the basis of the charges already framed and the  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/neighbour-disputes/ her latest blog]) materials on record.<br><br>The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988) consolidated and rationalised various laws regulating road transport. Obviously encouraged by this success, the State of Kerala in 2011 introduced further amendments to Rule 13(3) whereby only hotels with  Advocates [[http://acquitlaw.com/ her latest blog]] Four Star and above classifications were eligible for fresh FL-3 licenses. Matter has not even reached the Competent Authority and no final decision was taken to accept the bid of respondent No. In the light of the above settled proposition of law, the appellant Insurance Company cannot be held liable to pay the amount of compensation to the claimants for the cause of death of Shukurullah in road accident which had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of scooter by Ram Surat who admittedly had no valid and effective licence to drive the vehicle on the day of accident.<br><br>We are unable to subscribe to the aforesaid views. On the other hand, after going through the judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Megnostar we are persuaded to approve its views because of various reasons some of which we shall enumerate and explain hereinafter. To further buttress his final submission on the role of the Railways, the learned Counsel for the Appellant also cited P. (11) Classification necessarily implies the making of a distinction or discrimination between persons classified and those who are not members of that class.<br><br>Hence, the grievance of the HSIIDC that Pegasus should not have been permitted to stay outside the winding up proceeding is found meritless. Without considering the oral and documentary evidence, the High Court erred in interfering with the factual findings recorded by the trial court and the impugned judgment is liable to be set aside. The Appellate Court may not interfere with the finding of the trial court unless the finding recorded by the trial court is erroneous or the trial court ignored the evidence on record.<br><br>Much before that, when the BEC was informed that there were only two valid bids before it when it made its recommendation on September 08, 2010 and as per the Financial Rules there must be three or more bids to ensure that bidding process becomes competitive, the BEC realised its mistake and recalled its recommendation dated September 08, 2010. The High Court reversed the decree passed by the trial court without discussing oral and documentary evidence and several grounds raised before the trial court.<br><br>The Act came into force with effect from 1st July, 1989 replacing the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Indeed, the very idea of classification is that of inequality, so that it goes without saying that the mere fact of inequality in no manner determines the matter of constitutionality. This, coupled with the fact that the authority has right to accept or reject any bid and even to annul the whole bidding process, the High Court was not justified in interfering with such a decision of the BEC.<br><br>Fact remains that there is no approval by either of them. The scooterist was possessing a driving licence of driving HMV and he was driving a totally different class of vehicle, which act of his is in violation of Section 10(2) of the MV Act. Consequently its appeal has to be dismissed. The deduction of the High Court that the omission to frame charge under Section 397 IPC has resulted in miscarriage of justice is unconvincing in the facts of this case. Union of India[1983] INSC 167; , (1983) 4 SCC 598, the relevant paragraph has been provided below: The judgment discusses the Indian Railways Act, 1890 in which, Sections 27 and 28 correspond to Section 70 and 71 of the present Act.<br><br>7074 of 2010 preferred by HSIIDC but only to dismiss this case as we have found the grievance of Pegasus to be justified; it was entitled not only to stay outside the winding up proceeding in view of provisions of SARFAESI Act which is a special and later Act but was also entitled to exercise its rights without any fetters that were erroneously placed upon it by the company Judge and were approved also by the Division Bench. That meanwhile more than a decade has passed since the date of the incident, cannot also be readily over- looked.<br><br>Amendment Act 54 of 1994 - Statement of Objects and Reasons.
+
Besides the above, recognition of the aforesaid principle is also to be found in the fact that in Shirur Mutt (supra), though the eventual conclusion of the Court upholds the validity of the Act (Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951) certain specific provisions i. He submitted that, no doubt, the Tribunal specifically passed the order directing the appellant to pay the salary. He found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate its allegations that ninety six thousand odd rupees, out of the entry fees collected for the competition No.<br><br>The relevant of the report (page 1030/31) will require a specific notice and therefore is extracted below. The learned magistrate, on an elaborate examination of the evidence led before him by the parties, observed in his judgment that the accused had not denied the truth of the allegations of fact made by the prosecution, but had only challenged the insinuations against him that he was actuated by a dishonest intention in carrying on the competitions, particularly, No.<br><br>To sum up: the word 'Industry' for the purposes of Entry 52 of List I has been firmly confined by Tika Ramji to the process of manufacture or production only. He observed Advocates - [https://lexlords.com/buying-and-selling-property/ this guy] - that there was no evidence that the accused had used any part of the  Advocates ([http://lexlords.in/enforcement-of-securities/ this guy]) entry fees collected in any of the competitions, for his own use, or that he took any financial benefit out of the moneys collected in the recent competitions including No.<br><br>94 740 Held: (1) that under S. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the Government of Maharashtra had passed Government Resolution dated 14. Subsequent decisions including those of other Constitution Benches have re-affirmed that Tika Ramji's case authoritatively defined the word 'industry' - to mean the process of manufacture or production and that it does not include the raw materials used in the industry or the distribution of the products of the industry.<br><br>Section 21 which empowered the Commissioner and his subordinates to enter the premises  Advocates ([http://lexlords.uk this guy]) of any religious institution at any time for performance of duties enjoined under the Act has been  Advocates; [http://lexlordslegalservices.com this guy], struck down indicating consistency with the principle extracted above. 92 had been announced in the papers, the accused owed a total debt of prize moneys amounting to about four lacs of rupees in respect  Advocates; [http://nrilegalservices.me/how-to-challenge-a-will-the-indian-court-of-law/ dig this], of the previous competitions; that the accused had other debts to the tune of a lac and fifty seven 743 thousand odd rupees and that recent competitions had not even yielded sufficient amounts, collected by way of entry fees, to cover the guaranteed prize moneys.<br><br>In the result, the appeal is allowed, the decree passed 996 by the Board is set aside, and that of the Revenue Officer, Meerut affirmed by the Commissioner, restored. On that basis, it is argued that the financial burden is to be borne by the Government. The respondents will pay the costs of the appellants throughout, including the costs of the remand. But he also found that the accused had applied his own funds amounting to about a lac and a half rupees to the payment of prize moneys.<br><br>The learned counsel argued that the issue is as to whether appellant is entitled to recover this amount from the Government on the ground that the Government is providing 100% aid. Given the constitutional framework, and the weight of judicial authority it is not possible to accept an argument canvassing a wider meaning of the word 'industry'. 423(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure the High Court has, in an appeal from an order of acquittal, the power to reverse the order and find the accused guilty of the offence disclosed by the evidence.<br><br>1978 which prescribes that in case an employee of an aided school is terminated by the Management, but his termination is subsequently set aside in appeal by the competent authority, the Government would pay the back wages to the said employee subject to the satisfaction of two conditions, namely, that no other person has been appointed on the post during the intervening period and payment of back wages would not result in additional financial burden to the Government.<br><br>It was further submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that if the intent of the legislature was to incorporate Section 24 of SEBI Act alone as an offence, in that event, there would have been no necessity to incorporate "12A read with Section 24" inasmuch as Section 24 of the SEBI Act prescribes that all violations of provisions of SEBI Act would be punishable in terms of Section 24 of the SEBI Act, 1992. If general rule is applicable, this direction may not be of much consequence inasmuch it is the appellant who is supposed to pay the back wages to respondent No.<br><br>92, had been utilized by him for his own purposes and not for carrying on the competitions. He found that none of the statements made in the advertisements had been shown to be untrue; that it was a fact that it the time, the competition No. 4 as the employer employee relationship is between the appellant and respondent No.

Latest revision as of 10:26, 30 October 2018

Besides the above, recognition of the aforesaid principle is also to be found in the fact that in Shirur Mutt (supra), though the eventual conclusion of the Court upholds the validity of the Act (Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951) certain specific provisions i. He submitted that, no doubt, the Tribunal specifically passed the order directing the appellant to pay the salary. He found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate its allegations that ninety six thousand odd rupees, out of the entry fees collected for the competition No.

The relevant of the report (page 1030/31) will require a specific notice and therefore is extracted below. The learned magistrate, on an elaborate examination of the evidence led before him by the parties, observed in his judgment that the accused had not denied the truth of the allegations of fact made by the prosecution, but had only challenged the insinuations against him that he was actuated by a dishonest intention in carrying on the competitions, particularly, No.

To sum up: the word 'Industry' for the purposes of Entry 52 of List I has been firmly confined by Tika Ramji to the process of manufacture or production only. He observed Advocates - this guy - that there was no evidence that the accused had used any part of the Advocates (this guy) entry fees collected in any of the competitions, for his own use, or that he took any financial benefit out of the moneys collected in the recent competitions including No.

94 740 Held: (1) that under S. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the Government of Maharashtra had passed Government Resolution dated 14. Subsequent decisions including those of other Constitution Benches have re-affirmed that Tika Ramji's case authoritatively defined the word 'industry' - to mean the process of manufacture or production and that it does not include the raw materials used in the industry or the distribution of the products of the industry.

Section 21 which empowered the Commissioner and his subordinates to enter the premises Advocates (this guy) of any religious institution at any time for performance of duties enjoined under the Act has been Advocates; this guy, struck down indicating consistency with the principle extracted above. 92 had been announced in the papers, the accused owed a total debt of prize moneys amounting to about four lacs of rupees in respect Advocates; dig this, of the previous competitions; that the accused had other debts to the tune of a lac and fifty seven 743 thousand odd rupees and that recent competitions had not even yielded sufficient amounts, collected by way of entry fees, to cover the guaranteed prize moneys.

In the result, the appeal is allowed, the decree passed 996 by the Board is set aside, and that of the Revenue Officer, Meerut affirmed by the Commissioner, restored. On that basis, it is argued that the financial burden is to be borne by the Government. The respondents will pay the costs of the appellants throughout, including the costs of the remand. But he also found that the accused had applied his own funds amounting to about a lac and a half rupees to the payment of prize moneys.

The learned counsel argued that the issue is as to whether appellant is entitled to recover this amount from the Government on the ground that the Government is providing 100% aid. Given the constitutional framework, and the weight of judicial authority it is not possible to accept an argument canvassing a wider meaning of the word 'industry'. 423(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure the High Court has, in an appeal from an order of acquittal, the power to reverse the order and find the accused guilty of the offence disclosed by the evidence.

1978 which prescribes that in case an employee of an aided school is terminated by the Management, but his termination is subsequently set aside in appeal by the competent authority, the Government would pay the back wages to the said employee subject to the satisfaction of two conditions, namely, that no other person has been appointed on the post during the intervening period and payment of back wages would not result in additional financial burden to the Government.

It was further submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that if the intent of the legislature was to incorporate Section 24 of SEBI Act alone as an offence, in that event, there would have been no necessity to incorporate "12A read with Section 24" inasmuch as Section 24 of the SEBI Act prescribes that all violations of provisions of SEBI Act would be punishable in terms of Section 24 of the SEBI Act, 1992. If general rule is applicable, this direction may not be of much consequence inasmuch it is the appellant who is supposed to pay the back wages to respondent No.

92, had been utilized by him for his own purposes and not for carrying on the competitions. He found that none of the statements made in the advertisements had been shown to be untrue; that it was a fact that it the time, the competition No. 4 as the employer employee relationship is between the appellant and respondent No.