About NRI Legal Services

The Appellate Tribunal held that on a reading-as a whole of the clauses of the agreement aforesaid the appellant was an employee of the Treasurers and not of the Bank, It did not address itself pointedly 1442 to the question as to what was the exact relation between the Bank and the Treasurers. themselves were the servants of the Bank and not independent contractors. Thereupon, he saw that accused Ram Kailash and driver Mangi Lal were on the suzuki motorcycle. The endorsement was in the following manner: Before the Appellate Tribunal both parties appear to have concentrated their attention on the question as to whether the employees of the Cash Department were servants of the Bank or of the Treasurers.

We may also extract, at Advocates (discover this info here) this stage, the endorsement which the Respondent made on the Promissory Note Advocates (discover this info here) acknowledging that the cheques handed over to the Complainant/Appellant herein were actually issued by him and agreeing that the same may be presented for payment after 25th September, 2007. 2011, the Nagar Panchayat Advocates - additional resources, was restrained, by an ad-interim injunction from interfering with the appellants possession of the suit property.

The above would stand fortified by the note of caution issued by the Bombay Stock Exchange in the form Advocates - discover this info here - of a notice/memorandum alerting its members with regard to the necessity of exercising care and caution in case of high volume of trading in illiquid scrips, as already noted. 83(3), it could not be ordered under 0. This finding of the High Court, in our view, is against the law laid down by this Court in the case of Dhannalal (supra), wherein it is laid down that it is not necessary to implead all the co- owners in the eviction petition.

Mangla Ram, who was sitting on the back side of the motorcycle, cried that someone from the suzuki motorcycle has fired upon him. Respondent was charged under Sections 302, 120-B, IPC and Sections 3/25 and 3/27 of the Arms Act. For it is on this basis that the personal rights of the party, that is to say, the law which determines his majority or minority, his marriage, succession, testacy or intestacy, must depend".

83(3) is a special provision relating to amendments, -and that it must be construed as excluding 0. Injured Mangla Ram was operated at Jodhpur Hospital, where he died on 22. 37) Coming to the first question, in our considered opinion, the High Court erred in holding that the daughter of late A. Division), Kopergaon, seeking annulment thereof and perpetual injunction against the Nagar Panchayat and the State as defendants.

Sarpach Mangla Ram was taken to Kuchera hospital, and thereafter, to Nagaur and from there, he was referred to Jodhpur hospital. 1 had offered the concession period of 12 years. Accused Durga Ram was charged under Sections 120-B and 302 in alternative 302/34 IPC and accused Ghewar Ram was charged under Section 120-B IPC, to which they pleaded not guilty. whereas the civil status is governed universally by -one single principle, namely, that of domicil, which is the criterion established by law for the purpose of determining civil status.

Upon this report, In-charge of Police Station Kuchera registered a case under Section 307/34 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act and commenced investigation. Kanjana was a necessary party to the eviction petition filed by the appellants and hence failure to implead her rendered the eviction petition as not maintainable. (4) The last contention is based on the provision in s. 139 of 2011 in the court of Civil Judge (Sr. The result, according to the appellants, is that if an amendment could not be ordered under s.

Accused Ghewar Ram was challaned under Section 302/34 and 120-B IPC and third person namely Durga Ram was declared as absconding. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal granting injunction, the defendant-respondents moved the High Court under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 by way of civil revision, which was registered as C. While it is correct that trading in such illiquid scrips is per se not impermissible, yet, voluminous trading over a period of time in such scrips is a fact that should attract the attention of a vigilant trader engaged/engaging in such trades.

The first relevant fact that has to be taken note of is that the scrips in which trading had been done were of illiquid scrips meaning thereby that such scrips were not listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange and, therefore, was not a matter of everyday buy and sell transactions. in its bid had offered concession period of 19 years and respondent No. The prayer for temporary injunction though refused by the trial court, the appeal before the District Judge-II was allowed and by order dated 11.

It did not also consider the question as to what would be the position of the employees of the Cash Department vis-a-Vis the Bank if it were held that the Treasurers Id. Accused-respondent Ram Kailash fired with pistol, to whom, he and Mangla Ram Sarpanch identified. Let us apply the aforesaid test to the facts of the present cases before us wherein admittedly there in no direct evidence forthcoming. Later on Durga Ram was arrested and he was charged under Sections 302/34 and 120-B, IPC.

1 had offered minimum concession period, it was selected by the BEC for recommendation as a Developer. In our opinion, that was not a correct approach to the determination of the controversy between the parties. 90(2) that the procedure prescribed in the Code of Civil Procedure is to apply subject to the provisions of the Act and the Rules. The appellants against this notice filed a suit being RCS No. Thereafter, police filed charge-sheet against accused-respondent under Sections 302, 120-B IPC and 3/25 of the Arms Act.