About Lawyer In Chandigarh

This section empowers the Commissioner and his Advocates (websites) subordinate officers and also persons authorised by them to enter the premises of Advocates - homepage, any religious institution Advocates - websites, or place of worship for the purpose of exercising any power conferred or any duty imposed by or under the Act. The latest pronouncement of the House of Lords on this question is to be found in Edwards (Inspector of Taxes) v. Viscount Simonds observed at page 586:- "For it is universally conceded that, though it is (1) [1940]8I.

The two appellants jointly made a murderous assault on one Saurindra Gopal Roy at about 6-30 p. You are also collecting intelligence about the security arrangements on the border area and you make such intelligence available to the Portu- 388 guese authorities. All of them belonged to a village called Mirzapur which is within the police station Beldanga, district Murshidabad. These activities which are being carried on by you with the object of causing further deterioration in the relations between the Portuguese Government and the Indian Government over the question of Goan National Movement, are prejudicial to the security of India and to the relations of India with Portugal.

It is a traditional custom universally observed not to allow access to any outsider to the particularly sacred parts of a temple as for example, the place where the deity is located. It may be added here that the plaintiff's mother had left for Patan with his son some days previously when the plaintiff came back home from his office, he "discovered that she had taken away everything with her and had left nothing behind".

, however, argued on behalf of the State Government that in the instant case, the jury had returned a unanimous verdict of not guilty and that, therefore, there was no prejudice to the accused persons. The deceased along with two friends of his, of the same village, examined as P. Bairstow and Another(3). There are also fixed hours of worship and rest for the idol when no disturbance by any member of the public is allowed.

We agree, however, with the High Court in the view taken by it about section 21. The match was over by 5 p. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior and others[1]. " In their Lordships' opinion, this is necessarily the correct view. (b) The appellants had challenged the order of the Education Officer refusing to pay the back wages by filing writ petition earlier which was withdrawn without seeking any Advocates (websites) liberty to file a fresh petition.

" In our opinion, the legal position in the instant case is the same. There was, owing to litigation, previous enmity between the deceased and the appellants. It is true that the incompetence of the jury empanelled in this case was raised by the counsel for the State Government in the High Court but in view of the findings arrived at by the High Court, as quoted above, the position is clear in law that irrespective of the result, it was no trial at all The question of prejudice does not arise because it is not a mere irregularity.

Workers of the Company(1) the Tribunal considered the question of neutralisation of the rise of the cost of living by the grant of dearness allowance and was of the opinion that cent per cent neutralisation cannot be allowed, as it would lead to a vicious circle and add fillip to the inflatory spiral but a case of "mis-trial", as the Judicial Committee put it. on the 3rd November, 1951. It is unfortunate that a prosecution which has been pending so long in respect of an offence which is said to have been committed about eleven years ago, should end like this but it will be open to the State Government, if it is so advised, to take steps for a retrial, as was directed by the Judicial Committee in the reported case referred to above.

But in such cases the determination in point of law is that the facts proved or admitted provide evidence to support the Commissioners' conclusions". They have no doubt that in those circumstances the conviction and sentence should not be allowed to stand. "No doubt there are many cases in which Commissioners, having had proved or admitted before them a series of facts, may deduce therefrom further conclusions which are themselves conclusions of pure fact. nThe plaintiff told her that if she had made up her mind to go, he would send the car to take her to the station and offered to pay her Rs.

It is well known that there could be no such thing as an unregulated and unrestricted right of entry in a public temple or other religious institution, for persons who are not connected with the spiritual functions thereof. Therefore, second petition on the same cause with same prayer was not permissible in view of the judgment of this Court in Sarguja Transport Service v. She left Bombay apparently in the plaintiff's absence for Jalgaon by the afternoon train.

But she 884 refused the offer. They think that the effect of the incompetence of a juror is to deny to the accused an essential part of the protection accorded to him by law and that the result of the trial in the present case was a clear miscarriage of justice. and all the three of them were returning together to their village. nIn Buckingham and Carnatic Company Ltd. In the course of the return they were passing at about 6-30 p.

1 and 2, attended a foot-ball match that evening at Beldanga.