LexLords NRI Legal Services Harrow By NRI Legal Services LexLords

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Revision as of 02:19, 17 October 2018 by 170.238.184.59 (talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

NRI legal services - https://lexlords.com/domestic-violence-act/. State of Karnataka and Ors. The market is open, and NRI Legal Services writ large throughout the territory of the Town Area Committee and anybody can purchase from anybody and anybody can sell to anybody, without any control or intervention by the Contractor, NRI Legal Services whose position is simply that of a taxcollector on behalf of the Town Area Committee. 1997 and the existing notification dated 21. 21 is also wrong, FAZL ALI J. 8)], underwear [Item No. For instance, if he opts for benefit under notification dated 06.

1986 vis-a-vis notification No. 14, the other extreme view that Art. Consequently, if the benefit of notification dated 21. 1986 for the same assessment year. If the administrative body pro- ceeds to classify persons or things on a basis which has no rational relation to the objective of the legislature, its action can certainly be annulled as offending against the equal protection clause This is clearly the position, and it is submitted, there is nothing wrong with it legally and no interference of the petitioner's rights.

14 provides no further constitutional protection to personal liberty than what is afforded by Art. I, therefore, agree with the High Court that section 5(1) of the Act in so far as it empowers the State Govern- ment to direct "cases" to be tried by a Special Court of- fends against the provisions of article 14 and therefore the Special Court had no jurisdiction to try these "cases" of the respondents. The clear recital of a definite objective in the earlier Ordinance and the impugned Ordinance which amended it, furnished a tangi- ble and rational basis of classification and the Ordinance and the notification did not violate Art.

Instead of getting the pay, he gets the profits, if any, and runs the risk of incurring losses if his gross realisations are less than what he paid. 70 it is evident that the blood of the victim [Item 1(b)] was found in the clothing of the accused i. --Where the legislative policy is clear and definite and as an effective method of carrying out that policy a discretion is vested by the statute upon a body of administrators or officers to make selective application of the law to certain classes or groups of persons, the statute itself cannot be condemned as a piece of discriminatory legislation.

The issue has been examined and it is clarified that a dealer can avail the benefit of either of these two notifications in any financial year. CIRCULAR A question has been raised as to the applicability of Finance Department notification No. nWhile on the one hand it cannot be said that any variation of procedure which operates materially to the disadvantage of the accused is discriminatory and violates Art. 1994 and similar subsequent notification dated 12.

At the hearing of the petition before us it was agreed by and between counsel on both sides that the petition has to be disposed of on the basis of the bye-laws of 1942 only and learned counsel for the respondent Commit- tee has produced the original bye-laws of 1942 before us " The petitioner has to his petition annexed copies of a set of bye-laws dated June 24, 1942, and a copy of a resolu- tion of the respondent Committee dated March 16, 1950, recommending the addition of several bye-laws to the previ- ous bye-laws.

2000 is being availed in any financial year, the dealer shall be debarred from claiming any benefit under notification dated 6. nonly he must pay the prescribed tax to the Town Area Commit- tee through the Contractor. [The Legisla- ture should however have recourse to legislation like this only in very special circumstances. 2012, this Court considered the question whether the approval granted by the State Government for the acquisition of land can be considered as an approval of the housing scheme within the meaning of Section 3(f)(vi) of the Act and answered the same in negative.

In ray judgment, the High Court was right in quashing the conviction 347 of the respondents in the one case and in prohibiting fur- ther proceedings in the other case and these appeals should be dismissed. In such cases, the power given to the execu- tive body would import a duty on it to classify the subject matter of legislation in accordance with the objective indicated in the statute. 237 It should be mentioned here that the question as to what the powers of the High Court under articles 226 and 227 and of this Court under article 136 of the Constitution may be, is one that will have to be decided on a proper occasion.

--A distinction must be drawn between "dis- crimination without reason" and "discrimination with reason" 437 The whole doctrine of classification is based on this dis- tinction and on the well-known fact that the circumstances which govern one set of persons or objects may not neces- sarily be the same as those governing another set of persons or objects so that the question of unequal treatment does not really arise as between persons governed by different conditions and different sets of circumstances.

1986 for the financial year 2000-2001, he would not be entitled to claim simultaneous benefit in the same year under the notification providing for reduce rate of tax on cement in course of inter-state trade or commerce without any supportive Form C or D. It is not a question of an unconstitutional administration of a statute otherwise valid on its face but here the uncon- stitutionality is writ large on the face of the statute itself. In Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Limited v.

Furthermore, from the evidence of P.