LexLords NRI Legal Services Toronto By NRI Legal Services LexLords

NRI legal services - https://lexlords.com/help/. In some cases the in-service candidates, because of the weightage of marks, have secured more than the maximum marks of 200, specified in the CET. In the petition, the grounds taken by the appellants were that there was no allegation of any corrupt practice in the entire complaint insofar as they are concerned. However, they submitted that even on transfer they continued to hold the public office and, therefore, requirement of obtaining sanction was mandatory.

Pinky Anand, ASG appearing for the Union of India submitted that since advertisement was already issued, it would be appropriate to continue the college admissions without reservation for in-service candidates. 2016 passed by this Court of giving weightage to all the eligible in-service candidates, the benefit would apply even in respect of State seats in non-Government colleges, including statutory Universities who have to follow the merit list prepared as per the Common Entrance Examination.

It was argued on behalf of the interventionists that the decision to strictly follow Regulation 9 may be made applicable only to academic year 2016-17 and not for an earlier period, in respect of which the admission process has already been completed and more so because the students have taken admission on that basis and commenced their academic year. The trial court which has the benefit of watching the demeanor of the witnesses is the best judge of the credibility of the witnesses.

Even though the appellate court is entitled to consider, whether in arriving at a finding of fact, the trial court had placed the burden of proof incorrectly or failed to take into consideration any admissible evidence and/or had taken into consideration evidence brought on record contrary to law; the appellate court should not ordinarily set aside a judgment of acquittal in a case where two views are possible, though the view of the appellate court may be the more probable one.

Shri Ranjit Kumar, Solicitor General appearing for King Georges Medical College supported the stand taken by the Attorney General. It was further submitted that the direct candidates were willing to give undertaking/bond to the effect that after passing out Post-Graduate Degree Courses they would serve in remote or difficult areas in the State for a period as may be specified. In our judgment, this question can be answered only in the negative.

The only point for consideration in the appeal is whether the issue of licences to small taxi cabs between 10 and 19 H. to ply in the streets of Calcutta and the fixation of lower rates of tariff for this class of taxis than that prescribed for taxis between 22 and 30 H. It was also contended that even though some of the candidates who were keen to work in remote and/or difficult areas, in absence of any notification issued by the State Government to invite applications for quite some time for appointment as Medical Officers in remote and difficult areas, the interventionists - the aspiring eligible candidates - were denied opportunity to work as Medical Officers in the State hospitals.

and taking cognizance of the complaint, the trial court should have satisfied itself that due sanction, as required under Section 19 of the P. It may be mentioned that at the time of filing the complaint, the appellants had been transferred from the offices which they were holding by virtue of their promotion. , has been obtained and since no such sanction was obtained, such an order for further investigation could not NRI Legal Services have been passed by the trial court.

But before it could NRI Legal Services be signed, one Judge went on leave. violates the fundamental rights of the appcllants who are owners of taxi cabs between 22 and 30 H. It was further submitted that a separate list of in-service NRI Legal Services candidates can be maintained to the extent of 30% seats. ; under articles 14 and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution. It is a well-established principle of law, consistently reiterated and followed by this Court that while dealing with a judgment of acquittal, an appellate court must consider the entire evidence on record, so as to arrive at a finding as to whether the views of the trial court were perverse or otherwise unsustainable.

The facts are not the same as here because the judgment was actually delivered in open court and both the judges who constituted the Bench were present and concurred in it. The counsel appearing for the interventionists placed a comparative chart depicting the irrational effect due to the fresh merit list. Preparation of combined merit list results in unequals being treated equally; and, more so, leads to preposterous results.

Act read with Section 190 of the Cr. 101017 of 2014 seeking quashing of the entire proceedings. That shows the unfair manner in which the meritorious candidates have been pushed down in the merit list. It was further submitted that before directing further investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr. It has been repeatedly. Further, the reservation of 30% seats was limited to Government Colleges but the fresh common merit list was applied to all the colleges and Universities including non-Government medical colleges in the State.

Therefore, these appellants filed another Criminal Petition No. According to the appellants, this order was passed by the High Court on erroneous statement made by the counsel as neither the investigation was completed nor final report was filed in the court. He submitted that reservation hitherto applied only to State colleges, but now with the dispensation adopted in terms of order dated 12. This would assuage the impression being created that those candidates were un-willing to work in remote and difficult areas.