LexLords NRI Legal Services Smethwick By NRI Legal Services LexLords

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Revision as of 21:57, 19 October 2018 by 170.238.184.59 (talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

The NRI legal services (they said) expressions "offences", "classes of offences" and "classes of cases" clearly indi- cate and obviously imply a process of classification of offences or cases 9078 of 2016 and Civil Appeal No. 17 of 1961 and Land Acquisition (Amendment Act 1984) that the said lands are needed to be acquired for the purpose specified above. 9079 of 2016 filed by Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Bantu Singh, accused, was acquitted. He succumbed to his injuries on March 25, 1998 at Agra.

The combined effect of all the impugned orders is that the High Court held that M/s. However, eventually Gurubachan was allowed to go away and he went to Balaghat. The learned Judge who tried 842 the accused, convicted the appellants and two other persons under section 302 read with section 149 of the Penal Code and sentenced them to transportation for life, and convicted Ajaib Singh under section 201 read with section 149 and sentenced him to three years' R.

Guangdong Yuantian Engineering Company (GYT) of China and M/s. Raj Kumar fell down on the ground and PW-8 took him to the hospital at Bharatpur. In appeal before the High Court, the conviction and sentence of the appellant-accused was maintained while the other accused persons were acquitted of all the charges. Aggrieved of the impugned acquisition notifications, the landowners challenged the validity of the same by way of filing Writ Petitions before the High Court of Karnataka urging various NRI legal services (recommended site) grounds and prayed for quashing the same.

In this behalf, it would be relevant to mention, that whilst it is open to an accused to raise a defence in the nature suggested by learned counsel, there is an obvious pitfall where an accused chooses to do so, in the sense that by raising such a plea, the accused acknowledges the occurrence itself. The appellant-accused along with others was convicted by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track), NRI Legal Services Bharatpur under Sections 302 read with 34 of the IPC and under Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act.

And whereas the West Bengal Legislature is not in session and the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action '" The fact that an Ordinance had to be passed pending the passing of this Bill and the preambles to the (1) [1952] INSC 50; [1953] S. The first contention advanced at the hands of learned counsel for the appellant was, that the appellant had fired gunshots at the mob of villagers only as a matter of self-defence, when the accused-appellant and the co-accused, had been attacked.

and the remaining two accused were charged with the offence under section 201 read with section 149 of that Code. The learned single Judge of the High Court, after hearing the parties arrived at the conclusion that the facts of the case were similar to those in the decision of this Court in the case of H. A police officer arrived in village Dalam shortly after- wards, and after investigation a charge-sheet was submitted against seven persons including the present appellants. There is yet another predicament which he is liable to encounter, when raising such a defence.

44 went to Balaghat, brought Gurubachan back with him to Gondia and handed him over to the C. 9080-9081 of 2016filed by the Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Then, on the 16th of February the Station Officer P. And whereas the Government of Karnataka is satisfied after considering the report of the special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, Bangalore under sub-section (2) of Section 5A and section 6(1) of special Land Acquisition Act (Central Act 1 of 1894) as amended by Karnataka Act No.

The question whether the Nawab's managerhad authority to complete the contract on the Nawab's beha when he met the plaintiff after this does not arise, for on that date there was already a binding contract in existence. nIt will be noticed that section 11 of the Saurashtra Ordinance, like section 5 (1) of the West Bengal Special Courts Act, refers to four distinct categories, namely, "offences", "classes of offences", "cases" and "classes of cases" and empowers the State Government to direct any one or more of these categories to be tried by the Special Court constituted under the Act.

, the challenge is to the judgment and orders dated 28th July, 2016 and 11th August, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court. At the trial, five of the accused were charged with offences under section 302 read with section 149 and under section 201 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal, the Punjab High Court upheld the conviction of the present appellants and acquitted the remaining three persons. TATA Projects Limited (TPL) as a Joint Venture (hereinafter referred to as the GYT-TPL JV) are eligible to bid for a tender invited by the Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited (for short NMRCL) on 12th May, 2016.

, the challenge is to the judgment and orders dated 28th July, 2016 and 12th August, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court.