Little Known Facts About Lawyer In Chandigarh.

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Revision as of 03:59, 23 October 2018 by 191.5.176.147 (talk) (Created page with "It is true that the objection was taken before the learned Sessions Judge and, therefore, the Explanation cannot be applied. The injury proved fatal. The appellant whipped out...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

It is true that the objection was taken before the learned Sessions Judge and, therefore, the Explanation cannot be applied. The injury proved fatal. The appellant whipped out a pistol and shot the boy in the abdomen. "The Court may sanction the giving of leases or farms of the whole or part of any property under its charge, and may direct the mortgage or sale of any part of such property, and may direct the doing of all 335 such other acts as it may judge to be most for the, benefit of the property and the advantage of the ward".

In the comment, it has been mentioned that free Malayalam translation of the grounds of detention and relied upon documents had been supplied to the detenu to make him aware of the grounds and reasons for his detention under the COFEPOSA Act and, therefore, the ground had no relevance. He is charged with the murder of a young boy named Maghar Singh, aged about 15 or 16. It has been commented that the relevant writings were very much legible and photocopies of the FIR and Search List were furnished to the detenu.

Parawise comments of the sponsoring authority, that is, the Directorate of Enforcement, Kochi has been obtained. The word "reasonably" in the definition is very important. Various contentions have been raised in the representation that the detenu had studied only upto 10th standard in the Malayalam medium school of his native place and though he can write and read certain English words, he does not have enough knowledge to understand the meaning of the English words and sentences.

As indicated earlier, such a ground was raised before the High Court and not found favour. What the landlord might reasonably expect to get from a hypothetical tenant, if the building were let from year to year, affords the statutory yardstick for determining the annual value. The Code of Criminal Procedure in laying down the omissions or irregularities which either vitiate the proceedings or not does not anywhere 744 specifically say that a mistake committed by a police officer during the course of the investigation can be said to be an illegality or irregularity.

A further ground was urged that he was not supplied the reasons of his detention and the documents were not supplied within five days or maximum within fifteen days. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR J. The rent which the landlord might realise if the building were let is made the basis for fixing the annual value of the building. Investigation is certainly not an inquiry or trial before the court and the fact that there is no specific provision either way in ch.

, speaking on behalf of the Court in Corporation of Calcutta v. Ordinarily, as pointed out by Subba Rao, J. The appellant asked Maghar Singh, Advocates (use this link) the young boy to step aside a little so that he 365 may occupy a convenient seat. XXVII or on appeal or revision on account of among other things any error, omission or irregularity in the complaint, summons, Advocates [internet] warrant, proclamation, order, judgment or other proceedings before or during trial or in any inquiry or other proceedings under the Code.

Now, what is reasonable is a question of fact and it would depend on the facts and circumstances of a given situation. As has been stated in the comment, he was supplied the documents in the language known to him, that is, Malayalam within the statutory period and acknowledgement was obtained from him. Some had settled down in their seats and some bad not. But Maghar Singh did not move. On a perusal of the file, we find that after receipt of the representation, the Under Secretary, COFEPOSA, had narrated the grounds of detention and the file pertaining to the detention was also placed on record.

All of them went to the house of the bride to take the midday meal on the 12th March, 1954. Both of them and others of the same village went to attend a wedding in another village. Section 537 is to the effect that subject to the provisions contained in the previous sections of Advocates - internet, that Chapter no finding, sentence or order passed by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall be reversed or altered under Ch. -The appellant Basdev of the village of Harigarh is a retired military Jamadar.

It is obvious from this definition that unlike the English Law where the value of occupation by a tenant is the criterion for fixing annual value of the building for rating purposes, here it is the value of the property to the owner which is taken as the standard for making assessment of annual value. There is an Explanation added that "in determining whether any error, omission or irregularity in any proceeding under this Code has occasioned a failure of justice, the Court shall have regard to the fact whether the objection could and should have been raised at an earlier stage in the proceedings".

In these circumstances and on the footing that the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations, are merely directions regarding the course of conduct, can it be stated that a breach of it would vitiate the trial? It was also urged in the representation that he was Advocates (internet) unable to understand the documents which were furnished to him in Malayalam as they were not legible. The criterion is the rent realisable by the landlord and not the value of the holding in the hands the tenant.