Advocate In Chandigarh Secrets

This clause, in protecting the rights of females, had necessarily to give females the right to share in the coparcenary property even if there be no partition at all, because, on passing of property to a sole surviving coparcener, there could not possibly be any partition sought by the male members of the coparcenary body. What is the degree of proof required to hold brokers/sub-brokers liable for fraudulent/ manipulative practices under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations and/or liable for violating the Code of Conduct specified in Schedule II read with Regulation 9 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock-Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992?

The Government land was allowed to be encroached by all the respondents and construction work was carried out with the active collusion of the Government officials as per reports in the Press. (hereinafter referred to as the ˜Conduct Regulations, 1992). It was provided that slaughter houses owned by urban local bodies can be given on PPP Model to private persons by public auction/tender process on the condition that the private participants will have to modernise slaughter houses according to the prescribed standards.

New Cawnpore (2008) 144 Company Cases 71 (SC); 1 suffered a winding Advocates (get the facts) up order of the Company Judge of Punjab Rajasthan State Financial Corporation v. While construing Section 8(1)(d), Advocates (go to this web-site) the Division Bench has held:- When the coparcenary property passes to a sole surviving coparcener, provision has been made in clause (d) of Section 8(1). The language of clause (d) has to be interpreted as laying down that right to shares will vest in all females of the joint Hindu family who would have possibly received the right to a share if at any earlier time there had been partition in the family in any of the three manners laid down in clauses (a), (b) and (c).

The appellant also mentioned that the matter had been highlighted by the Press to open the eyes of the authorities but the respondents were doing virtually nothing in this regard and the historic Fort is likely to be completely ruined, which will cause national loss to our ancient heritage and composite culture. This is the correct view of the law on Section 8(1)(d), and we endorse it. Pursuant to the aforesaid directions of this Court, the State Government vide its G.

The right conferred by clause (d) is, therefore, an independent right and not connected with the rights granted to the females under clauses (a), (b) and (c). It is significant that clause (d) gives a right independent of a partition and its scope should not be restricted by assuming a partition. We have already noted that the least amount of sale of alcohol (0. The females who are to get benefit are all those to whom a right to a share in the joint family property would have accrued if there had been a partition either under clause (a), or clause (b) or clause (c).

We cannot therefore detect any arbitrariness or capriciousness either in the classification, nay the unique treatment given by the State to hotels possessing Five Star rating. Origin of this plan of the Government can be traced to the directions which were given by this Court vide judgment dated December 07, 2006 in the case of Nagar Nigam, Meerut v. The dispute pertains to the construction, maintenance and operation of a slaughter house in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.

Its intent and purport is not to exclude some places; it cannot be read as a comprehensive definition; it is more of an illustration. The Explanation to this Section endeavours to include through iteration all public places. 1992 of the Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, Pune (hereinafter referred to as the development plan) and enforced it on and from 25. The argument on Advocates (go to this web-site) behalf of the Appellants pertaining to impermissibility of sub-classification on the grounds that Section 15C of the Abkari Act creates a composite class of public places is not acceptable to us.

Official Liquidator AIR 2006 SC 755 = (2005) 8 SCC 190; Bakemans Industries v. 08 per cent) occurs in Five Star hotels, which sale indubitably includes guest orders in room-service. Al Faheem Meat Exports Pvt. , (2006) 13 SCC 382 emphasizing the need for modernising the slaughter houses according to the prescribed standards. While the matter rested at that, a Development Plan of Shirdi was sanctioned by Notification No.

dated August 06, 2008, laid down Policy Guidelines for operation of animal slaughter houses owned Advocates (go to this web-site) by urban local bodies in the State on the basis of Private Public Participation (PPP) Model. The appellants are intending to construct a slaughter house with ultra modern technology. At this juncture, it is nobodys case that some hotels ought to have been granted Five Star Advocates - go to this web-site, grade or that the State has prohibited anyone from endeavouring to upgrade their hotels from Four Star to Five Star.

This is done by the Ministry of Tourism, which in turn is further guided by the criteria established in the hospitality trade. Shirdi/TPV-IV/7334 dated 15. Placing a moratorium on all hotels other than Five Star hotels, therefore, is not a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.