Advocate In Chandigarh - An Overview

In the facts stated above, we are persuaded to hold that our order appointing Shri Justice Virendra Singh (Retd. 4, on account of extensive sales and marketing worldwide, the trademark ˜BLENDERS PRIDE has come to acquire a tremendous reputation in various countries including India. and Southern Petro Chemical Industries Corporation Ltd. 2015 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure-P7. It has also applied for registration of the trademark ˜BLENDERS PRIDE under two applications in class 33 which are pending registration.

The picture that emanates from the above narration of facts Advocates (his explanation) is hazy, unclear and uncertain and we are left in serious doubt as to whether the constitutional/statutory functionaries or at least two of them had, at all, agreed on any name or names. On the above basis, a demand was raised on the appellants for consumption of electricity at the normal rate of tariff applicable on the ground that the industries had started earning profits. the period is May 1982 to April, 1984.

Apart from this one sentence, the petitioners do not elaborate any further. It is an ultimate subsidiary of Pernord Ricard S. On 12-7-1954 the management put up the following notice: The respondents are workmen employed in the Mills. 4 is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the United States of America. 38 reads The respondents never gave a copy of the alleged videography. 1 of 1964) that clause (1) of Article 194 no doubt makes a substantive provision of the said clause subject to the provisions of the Constitution; but in the context, those provisions cannot take in Article 19(1)(a), because the latter article does not purport to regulate the procedure of the legislature and it is only such provisions of the Constitution which regulate the procedure of the legislature which are included in the first part of Article 194(1).

4 had applied for and was granted registration of the said trademark in more than 50 countries and has been selling ˜BLENDERS PRIDE whisky in India through its licensee Seagram India Private Limited since 1995. The said demand insofar as the appellant, M/s. ) as Advocates (his explanation) Lokayukta was on the basis of the statement made on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh which now appears to be somewhat inaccurate. The Member (Judicial) adverted to the order passed by the Commissioner wherein the statement of Advocates (his explanation) the Manager (Sales) had been adumbrated in detail, referred to the other documents that had been put- forth by the revenue before the adjudicating authority and in course of discussion adverted to the principle stated in Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi vs.

Further, the petitioner sought permission to give further explanation immediately when the video clipping of the incident. Indian Penal Code for which he was awarded the lesser sentence of six months' rigorous imprisonment has become merely academical and the only question which remains to be considered by us here is whether he-was an "officer" within the meaning of section 21 (9), Indian Penal Code. Sub-rule (3) of Rule Advocates (his explanation) 7 does not restrict the right of the managers of various schools in making regular appointments in the established vacancies, what it does is to prevent the misuse of that provision and to prevent the aided school managers in creating short-term vacancies and appointing several persons in those vacancies so as to make them claimants under Rule 51-A.

A true copy of the letter sent by Petitioner No. is concerned is for the period from May 1982 to November, 1983, while for the appellant National Oxygen Ltd. 12 of the facts, the petitioners take it as a ground (Ground No. [1] and opined as follows: According to respondent No. It is unfortunate that constitutional/statutory functionaries, inspite of prolonged and extended meetings, continued to have serious differences on a relatively simple issue i.

Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. The letter was received by the Petitioner only on 23. In order to secure its proprietary rights in the said trademark, respondent No. Assembly case (Special Reference No. 2014, but the explanation was sought for on or before 27. 1 sent his reply to the letter seeking explanation by the Privilege Committee. It claims that it has coined and adopted the trademark ˜BLENDERS PRIDE through its licensee M/s Seagram Company Limited in the year 1973.

Looking to the mischief or evil sought to be remedied, we have to adopt a purposive construction of sub-rule (3) of Rule 7-A read with the proviso to Rule 51-A of Chapter XIV-A of the KER. The business of the Mills consists in the manufacture of oils and paints. 1 to Secretary of the Legislative Assembly dated 27. 12 reads The petitioner No. , which is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing a variety of alcoholic beverages worldwide. appointment of the Lokayukta. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATARAMA AYYAR J.

-The appellant is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, and owns a factory called Modi Oil Mills in the district of Meerut. Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Yashank Adhyaru, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-revenue would submit that the documents were produced before the adjudicating authority as well as the tribunal to show the nature of advance and the manner of transaction from which it is Advocates, read the full info here, demonstrable that there has been depression of the assessable value.

38) in the instant writ. [12] Apart from the vague reference in Para 3.