What Does Lawyer In Chandigarh Mean
And the question then arises does it have reference to the jurisdictional limits of the Municipality or to the ultimate termination or the commencement of the journey of the goods as the case may be. From perusal of the statement of objects and reasons, it reveals that the single member of the Tribunal was working fine under the Waqf Act, 1995 (before 2013 amendment). The Plaintiff did not acceded to this mode/option of dealing with the crisis.
On the 20th of August 1952, thirty six more temporary employees were put on the spare list and an application was made to the Industrial Tribunal Bihar, for including these thirty six persons also in the application which had been made for permission to discharge the temporary men; thus, all told, the application related to one hundred and five temporary men. Pursuant to this notice, 142 workmen mentioned therein, being the respondents in this appeal, were laid off from the 14th July 1954.
The management denied these alle- gations, and. The Defendant then showed a draft letter dated 22. Therefore, the appellant company no longer required the services of the temporary employees and they were Advocates (browse this site) put on the spare list as and 803 when their services were no longer required. They are sections 22 and 23, which are as follows: The Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act XLVIII of 1950, hereinafter referred to as the Act, contains special provisions with reference to certain disputes which Advocates, browse this site, might arise between parties, when there is already pending adjudication between them another industrial dispute.
To such a case, the rule of implied repeal may result in a vacuum which the law making authority may not have intended. Even assuming that the words "imported into or " exported from " could be restricted only to their derivative meaning and thus construed to mean only "brought into or taken Advocates [browse this site] out or away from" this general meaning it was submitted by the appellant is qualified by the use of the prefix "terminal" used adjectively with the word " tax", which makes it necessary to determine the meaning of the term terminal tax ".
The appellant-eighth defendant Shreya Vidyarthi is the adopted daughter of Srilekha Vidyarthi (since deceased) and also the legatee/ beneficiary of a Will left by Madhulekha Vidyarthi. Subsequently, in the year 1942, Hari Shankar Vidyarthi was married for the second time to one Rama Vidyarthi. 2001148 of more than 1,00,000 shares. 2001 to the Plaintiff and others present at separate meetings and arbitrarily accused the members including the Plaintiff of collusive transactions and informed the members present in the basis of reversal of transaction, with a draft reply from the Plaintiff to the Defendant.
To examine the question Advocates (browse this site) urged, it is apposite to take note of what De Smith, a well-known treaty, on the subject "Judicial Review" has said on this question [See De Smiths Judicial Review, 7th Edition, page 127 (3- 027) and page 135 (3-038)]. The application was made under section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. But there was at that time another industrial dispute between the parties pending final adjudication. On 26-7-1954 the workmen acting through their Union sent a notice to the management demanding full wages for the period of lay Advocates (link) off on the ground that it was unjustified and illegal.
In the year 1937 one Hari Shankar Vidyarthi married Savitri Vidyarthi, the mother of the respondent-plaintiff. However, since leave was granted to the respondents in the present case after giving full opportunity to the appellants to put forth their case, the question of revocation would arise only after evidence is led in the matter and on final determination of the suit. He had pro- nounced his award, and against that, both the parties 562 had preferred appeals to the Labour Appellate Tribunal, and they were pending at the date of the, notice.
The case of the appellant company was that the completion of the erection works for which these temporary men were originally employed was a gradual process and so far as the Cement Factory erection work was concerned, it was completed by the end of March 1952 except for certain minor additions and alterations. That dispute had been referred -under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act for adjudication to the Regional Conciliation Officer, Meerut.
630 of 1978) were born. and DSQ Software of all those members, who had a net delivery position in Settlement No. This being an industrial dispute as defined in section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act XIV of 1947, in the ordinary course, proceedings would have been taken with reference thereto under the provisions of that Act. The Trial Court was of the view that where leave is granted under Section 92 of the CPC without notice to the defendants in the suit, those defendants would have a right to apply for revocation of leave.
On the 12th of July 1952, forty nine out of the said sixty nine employees made an application, under section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, to the Chairman, Industrial Tribunal, Bihar, on the allegation that the appellant company had discharged sixty nine employees on the 5th July 1952 and had thereby contravened section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In dealing with this the High Court said: The implied repeal of an earlier law can be inferred only where there is enactment of a later law which had the power to override the earlier law and is totally inconsistent with the earlier law and the two laws cannot stand together.
Out of the aforesaid second wedlock, two daughters, namely, Srilekha Vidyarthi and Madhulekha Vidyarthi (defendants 1 and 2 in Suit No. If the later law is not capable of taking the place of the earlier law, and for some reason cannot be implemented, the earlier law would continue to operate. The idea of expanding the composition by the 2013 Amendment seems to make improvement in the functioning of the Tribunal with the help of two more members in the Tribunal.
