Everything About Lawyer In Chandigarh
The police force is charged with the duty not Advocates (browse around this website) only of detection of offences and of bringing offenders to justice, but also of preventing the commission of offences by persons with previous records of conviction or with criminal propensities. Section 2(17) of the Act defines a 'person' as including a joint family. Commissioner of Income- tax(1), and we agree with it. Section 21(2) states that "An Additional Judge so appointed shall discharge any of the functions of a District Judge' which the District Judge may assign to him".
in the case of State of Madras V. , the other two sections 55 or 56 are not prosecutions for offences or judicial proceedings, though the officer or authority charged with the duty aforesaid has to examine the information laid before him by the police. The Manager can make appointments in school even if the duration of which is less than one academic year but on daily-wage basis and if the duration of vacancy exceeds one academic year that can be filled up on scale of pay basis.
Whether the question is considered on the principles of Hindu law or on the provisions of the Excess Profits Tax Act, there was a change in the personnel of the Advocates; browse this site, firm on 17-10-1944, and the matter falls within section 8(1) of the Act. Be that as it may, the daughter having been later impleaded in the proceedings, this objection was not even available to respondent No. Their jurisdiction is a limited one and is limited to the discharge of such functions as may be entrusted to them by Advocates - browse around this website, the District Judge.
Provided also that on or after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, where a reference is pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, such reference shall abate if the secured creditors, representing not less than three-fourth in value of the amount outstanding against financial assistance disbursed to the borrower of such secured creditors, have taken any measures to recover their secured debt under sub-section (4) of section 13 of that Act.
1 to raise such objection for the first time in the revision because it was not raised in the courts below. , who were the members of the firm when it was constituted on 23-8-1940? But these Judges cannot discharge all the judicial functions of the District Judge. Applying this definition. The legislature has advisedly entrusted officers of comparatively higher rank in the police or in the magistracy with the responsible duty of examining the material and of being satisfied that such person is likely -again to engage himself in the commission of an offence similar to that for which he had previously been convicted.
The question whether there Advocates - browse around this website - was a change in the persons carrying on the business may now be considered independently of the principles of Hindu Law or the general law of Partnership and with special reference to the provisions of the Indian Excess Profits Tax Act. The erstwhile joint family of which they were members not being a partner in the new firm, it having ceased to exist by reason of the partition, there was, having regard to the definition in section 2(17) of the Act, a change in the persons who carried on the business.
In the above paragraphs this Court has clearly found that after the amendment of Rule 7A(3), in order for a qualified teacher to claim preferential appointment under the category on account of termination of vacancies as mentioned in Rule 51A, earlier appointment in such vacancies should have been for a duration of one full academic year namely, from 1st June of the previous year till the last day of March of the subsequent year. If the appointment in any such vacancy fell short of the period as mentioned above then such teacher cannot be held to have come under the category on account of termination of vacancies and consequently cannot claim preferential appointment in any future vacancies.
Richpal, Gajadhar and "Bhagat Ram Mohanlal, Hindu undivided family" consisting of three coparceners, Mohanlal, Chhotelal and Bansilal, it being immaterial for the present purpose whether the karta of the family was only Mohanlal, or all the three of them. Even otherwise, as rightly argued by learned counsel for the appellants, the High Court should not have allowed respondent No. As observed by Patanjali Sastri, C.
The proceedings contemplated by the impugned section 57 or for the matter of that. That was the view taken in Shanmugavel Nadar and Sons V. Then, the family became divided in 1944, and the result of it was that one of the three persons who were partners in the old firm, "Bhagat Ram Mohanlal" ceased to exist. For instance if the academic year is 2000-2001 the appointment in any such vacancy should have commenced on 1st June of 2000 and ended on 31st March of 2001.
On 17-10-1944, the two surviving partners of the old firm, Richpal and Gajadhar, entered into a contract of partnership with Mohanlal, Chhotelal and Bansilal.
