About Advocate In Chandigarh
The statements of some of the prosecution witnesses furnish indication of more than one fire-arm having been used at the incident. We have therefore to examine the question whether the definition of " Premises " as contained in s. These cases have not been fought on that ground and, in our opinion, it Advocates (have a peek at this website) is too late to raise for the first time a controversy in that form. (g) The Division Bench of the High Court, by order dated 14.
2010, dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants herein while modifying the sentence of life imprisonment to that of rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence under Section 304B while maintaining the sentence in respect of other offence. dissenting), that the respondent's complaint fell under the category of potential wages and the Advocates (have a peek at this website) authority appointed under the Act had no jurisdiction to decide the question of potential wages.
[1995] INSC 761; (1996) 2 SCC 71, had held that the deposit of the amount of the compensation in the States revenue account is of no avail and the liability of the State to pay interest subsists till the amount has not been deposited in Court. 3 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923, or clause (30) of s. Syed Ahmad Ishaque (supra) in support Advocates (have a peek at this website) of the proposition that the two conditions are cumulative and must -both' be established and that the burden of establishing them is on the person who seeks to have the election set aside.
1951 Cal- 126 25 applicable to these cases. Ram Manohar is also one of the accused who was put up for trial. concurring, JAGANNADHADAS J. National Fertilizers Corporation of India Ltd. 2 (8) of the Act is not comprehensive enough to be (1) A. As this point in this form has not Advocates (have a peek at this website) been raised in the courts below or even in the statement of the case in this Court, we refuse to go into that question, even assuming that the controversy thus raised does not require any fresh findings of fact.
42 of 2007 decided on 3-4-2007) that was relied upon by the Tribunal for dismissing the Revenues appeal took the view that there would be no application of Section 11-A(2-B) or Section 11-AB where differential duty was paid by the assessee as soon as it came to learn about the upward revision of prices of goods sold earlier. 2 (8) would not in terms apply to the tenements in question and that if any provisions of the Act could be attracted totes cases, cl.
The reasoning, shortly put, is: that on a true construction the document in question amounted to. It had the jurisdiction to decide what actually the terms of the contract between the parties were, that is to say, to determine the actual wages. , following the observations in Kandan Textiles V. Applying the above principles to the facts of the instant case the High Court -came to the conclusion that the document of the 7th February, 1949, on a proper reading of it, constituted an assignment of the decree.
2 defining " hotel or lodging house " could more appropriately be applied to the tenancies in question. 3 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923, or in any other market maintained by or belonging to a local authority or a stall let at variable rents at different seasons of the year for the retail sale of goods in any other market as defined in clause (39) of s. Adverting to the first point raised on behalf of the appellant, we have to notice an argument which was raised for the first time before 'us, namely, that the definition of " premises " in s.
The definition is in these terms:- " premises' means any building or part of a building or any hut or part of a hut let separately and includes- (a)the gardens, grounds and out-houses (if any) appertaining to such building or part of a building or hut or part of a hut, (b)any furniture supplied or any fittings affixed by the landlord for use of the tenant in such building or part of a building or hut or part of a hut, but does not include a room or part of a room or other accommodation in a hotel or lodging house or a stall in a municipal market as defined in clause (44) of s.
Banerjee(3), in which the order of the Government referring the dispute of a dismissed employee to the adjudication of a Tribunal was attacked as incompetent, and it was held by Mitter J. 945 Sub-section (36) defines 'strike' as follows:- " 'Strike' Advocates (click this site) means a total or partial cessation of work by the employees in an industry acting in combination or a concerted refusal or a refusal under a common understanding of employees to continue to work or to accept work, where such cessation or refusal is in consequence of an industrial dispute".
The Division Bench also dismissed the revision filed by the complainant. a transfer of the decree that was expected to be passed in the pending suit, that as the decree was not in existence at the date of the document it operated as an agreement to transfer the decree when it would be passed, that such an agreement could be enforced by a suit for specific performance as indicated by the (1) L. 3 of the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 ".
