Indicators On Advocate In Chandigarh You Should Know

Under the new Policy, the contracts of all the existing major and minor catering units were Advocates (look at here now) to be awarded and managed by the Zonal Railways. The court can only interfere if the policy framed is absolutely capricious or not informed by reasons or totally arbitrary and founded ipse dixit offending the basic requirement of Article 14 of the Constitution. The fact that in imposing confiscation and penalties under s. In terms of the said Policy, the contracts under Categories A, B and C Railway Stations were transferred to the IRCTC while the contracts granted under Categories D to F Railway Stations were continued under the control of the South Central Railways till the IRCTC was equipped to take over these units.

It was further held that under the Catering Policy, 2010, the license fee is liable to be revised based on the potentiality of each Railway Station and the turnover of the licensees during the previous years. The IRCTC was left with the running of the Food Plaza, Food Courts and Fast Food Units only. 2006, that the documents annexed to the contempt petition themselves show that Stage 1 clearance in respect of 80.

It was further stated that vide Advocates (Your Domain Name) letter dated 06. The said policy was replaced by the Catering Policy, 2010. The contracts held by the members of the Welfare Association were renewed during the subsistence of the Catering Policy, 2005. The members of the Welfare Association were granted licenses for running General Minor Units or Special Minor Units in Categories A, B and C Railway Stations. Pursuant to the Catering Policy, 2010, the South Central Railway granted renewal of licenses in favour of the licensees for a period of three years with effect from 21.

2013, the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Vijayawada, issued a bid notice inviting sealed bids on the Single Stage Two-Packet System from food and catering service providers for provision of catering services at the various GMUs of Advocates (look at here now) Categories A and B Railways Stations in the Vijayawada Division. 20(2) of the Constitution. " In the Nirvachanapaddhathi it is said that Sivadwijas should worship in the Garbagriham, Brahmins from the ante chamber or Sabah Mantabam, Kshatriyas, Vysias and Sudras from the Mahamantabham, the dancer and the musician from the Nrithamantabham east of the Mahamantabham and that castes yet lower in scale should content themselves with the sight of the Gopuram.

167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, the Collector of Customs acts 823 judicially is not decisive and does not attract the protection of Art. The main plea of the respondent-Association was that in terms of the Catering Policy, 2010, the existing licensees were entitled for renewal of their licenses for a period of three years, subject to their satisfactory performance, payment of all dues and arrears and withdrawal of court cases, if any. It was submitted as under: 2013, the approval of diversion of forest land was communicated by Additional Secretary, Uttarakhand to Additional Chief Conservator of Forests, Uttarakhand and that actual approval was accorded much before the pronouncement of the judgment and order dated 13.

507 Hectare of forest land (˜forest land for short) was accorded by MoEF on 03. Section 186 of the Act does not prevent the infliction of any other punishment to which the person concerned may be liable under any other law. The renewed licenses were to expire on 20. 1 in his affidavit in reply submitted that the concerned Vishnugad-Pipalkoti Project was cleared as far back as on 02. Hence, the present appeals are filed by the appellants.

2013 was issued for establishment of catering stalls/fruits and fruit juice stalls in SMUs in A1, A and B Category Railway Stations. Aggrieved, the respondent-Association, the members of which had existing licenses, filed a Writ Petition before the single Judge of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. 1 of the Catering Policy, 2010. In certain matters, as often said, there can be opinions and opinions but the Court is not expected to sit as an appellate authority on an opinion.

" The other Agamas also contain similar rules. 2013, the learned single Judge came to the conclusion that the Catering Policy, 2010 did not differentiate among the licensees based on the number of years for which they have been carrying on their business. A similar notification dated 03. They prayed that the appellant be directed to renew the licenses of the existing license holders of the canteens and fruits and fruit juice stalls. The learned single Judge held that the members of the Welfare Association are entitled for renewal of the licenses of the members subject to their satisfying the conditions stipulated in paras 16.

From the aforesaid pronouncement of law, it is clear as noon day that it is not within the domain of the courts to embark upon an enquiry as to whether a particular public policy is wise and acceptable or whether a better policy could be evolved. Vide judgment and order dated 16. 2010, the date on which the Catering Policy, 2010 was made effective in respect of the General Minor Units (GMUs) and Special Minor Units (SMUs) taken over from the IRCTC, subject to the conditions stipulated in paras 16.

On appeal filed by the appellants, the judgment and order of the learned single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench of the High Court in the Writ Appeals vide its judgment and order dated 12. The respondent-Association urged that the said action of inviting fresh bids is discriminatory Advocates, look at here now, and also contrary to the provisions of the Catering Policy, 2010. 2011 subject to fulfillment of certain conditions and that upon compliance of the conditions, final approval for transfer of forest land was accorded by MoEF on 25.

Since the license fee is subject to continuous revision and does not remain stagnant, the question of the Railways suffering any loss due to renewals would not arise. 1 of the Catering Policy, 2010. These licenses were granted in favour of the members of the respondents prior to the creation of the Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as IRCTC) under the Catering Policy, 2005.

Respondents before us are the South Central Railway Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association, (hereinafter referred to as the Welfare Association).