LexLords NRI Legal Services Kerala By NRI Legal Services LexLords

NRI legal services https://lexlords.com/domestic-violence-act/; A Public Prosecutor means any person appointed under Section 24 and includes any person acting under the directions of the Public Prosecutor,(vide Section 2(u) of the Code). The objection with regard to the competence of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhopal NRI Legal Services is hereby rejected. The result therefore is that the appeal will be allowed, the judgment of the High Court on, reference set aside, the majority verdict of the jury Pronouncing the appellant -not guilty of the offence with which he was 444 charged accepted and the appellant acquitted and discharged and forthwith set at Appeal allowed.

The prosecution examined 11 witnesses which included investigating officer who effected recovery of the contraband, Superintendent of Customs who received information, Assistant Chemical Examiner, the landlord of the premises in possession of the appellant as a licensee/ tenant and the PSI of the State Excise. If the facts and circumstances of the case are such that a reasonable body of men could arrive at one conclusion or the -other, it is not competent to the Sessions Judge or the High Court to substitute their verdict in place of the verdict which has been given by the jury.

Naidu below his signature has written '6-4-1948'. I am satisfied that this case is distinguishable from the case relating to the West Bengal Act, but I also feel that the legislatures should have recourse to legislation such as the present only in very special circumstances. nThe High Court after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that the publication in question did amount to contempt of court, as it was calculated to lower the pres- tige and dignity of courts and bring into disrepute the administration of justice.

The present appeal, by special leave, assails the order dated 13th February, 2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No. Even if the Sessions Judge or the High Court would, if left to themselves, have arrived at a different verdict, it is not competent to the Sessions Judge to make a reference nor to the High ,Court to accept the same and substitute their own verdict for the -verdict of the jury provided the verdict was such as could be NRI Legal Services arrived at by a reasonable body of men on the facts and circumstances of the case.

3438 of 2010 whereby the learned Single Judge has modified the order dated 30th August, 2010 whereunder the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in C. The question of referring individual cases to the special court does not arise in this appeal, and I do not wish to express any opinion NRI Legal Services on it nThis, in my opinion, is in plain language the rationale of the Ordinance, and it will be going too far to say that in no case and under no circumstances can a legislature lay down a special procedure for the trial of a particular class of offences, and that recourse to a simplified and less cumbrous procedure for the trial of those offences, even when abnormal conditions prevail, will amount to a violation of article 14 of the Constitution.

The old Criminal Procedure Code (1898) contained an identical provision in Section 270 thereof. As the appellant was not prepared to substantiate the allegations which he made and which he admitted to be based on hearsay and did not think it proper even to express any regret for what he had done, the court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for three months The document in hand is not of that type It merely embodies a present agreement to execute another document in the future which will, when executed, have that effect.

nAn agreement to sell, or an agreement to transfer at some future date, is to be distinguished because that sort of document does not of itself purport to effect the trans- fer. To confine the jurisdiction within the territorial limits to the court at Aurangabad would amount, in our view, to impermissible and illogical truncation of the ambit of Sections 178 and 179 of the Code. Be that as it may, on a cumulative reading of Sections 177, 178 and 179 of the Code in particular and the inbuilt flexibility discernible in the latter two provisions, we are of the comprehension that in the attendant facts and circumstances of the case where to repeat, a single and combine search operation had been undertaken simultaneously both at Bhopal and Aurangabad for the same purpose, the alleged offence can be tried by courts otherwise competent at both the aforementioned places.

The jury are the sole judges of the facts and it is the right of the accused to have the benefit of the verdict of the jury. The other notes in the office file show that the correct date of the two signatures was 6th August, 1947. The appellant Nargundkar below his signature has written '6-4- 1947'. 927/PW/2007 had permitted the appellant to be heard at the stage of framing of charge under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, CrPC), by expressing the view that the role of the complainant is limited under Section 301 CrPC and he cannot be allowed to take over the control of prosecution by directly addressing the Court, but has to act under the directions of Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the case.