LexLords NRI Legal Services Smethwick By NRI Legal Services LexLords

NRI legal services - https://lexlords.com/estate-management/. returned the :case: to the District NRI legal services - site - Court 'for: disposal, in conformity 595 with 'their decision. 1043/2006 before framing of charge on 12th June 2007, was listed on 13 dates. The latter was entirely deceived as to the identity of the person with whom he was transacting. withdrawn 'and the case was heard by Trevor Harries C. A police officer arrived in village Dalam shortly after- wards, and after investigation a charge-sheet was submitted against seven persons including the present appellants.

" The position, therefore, is that when the transfer of possession is voidable merely by reason of its being induced by fraud, which can be rescinded at the option Of the owner, the consent which followed false representation is a sufficient consent within the meaning Of section 30(2) of the Sale of Goods Act. The learned Judge who tried 842 the accused, convicted the appellants and two other persons under section 302 read with section 149 of the Penal Code and sentenced them to transportation for life, and convicted Ajaib Singh under section 201 read with section 149 and sentenced him to three years' R.

acquired under his purchase, and as such deprivation was not a reasonable restriction on the respondent's exercise of his vested right, section 7 was not saved by clause (5) of that article and was void. On appeal, the Punjab High Court upheld the conviction of the present appellants and acquitted the remaining three persons. The position, however, is entirely different if the fraud committed is of such a character as would prevent there being consent at all on the part of the owner to give possession of the goods to a particular person.

There was not the agreement of her mind with that of the seller that was required in order to establish any contractual right at all. The Bill was eventually passed as the amending Act and it . The High Court accordingly convicted the appellant of the offence under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him as above. Bantu Singh, accused, was acquitted. But where the fraud induced an error regarding the identity of the person to whom or the property in respect of which possession was given, the whole thing is void and there is no consent in the sense of an agreement of two persons on the same thing in the same sense.

It clear detail is enclosed in Annexure 1 number of witnesses examined so far; and the cause for delay in the completion of trial. After framing of charge, the matter has proceeded before the Sessions Court on 133 dates. From this affidavit, it is noticed that the criminal trial No. It is more so when power under Section 34 of the Act is given to the High Courts, which are Constitutional Courts. Simmons( 1) Lord Haldane made the following observations while dealing with a similar point "The appellant thought that he was dealing with a different person, the wife of Van der Borgh, and it was on that footing alone that he parted with the goods.

In paragraph 9 to 11 of the affidavit, the break up has been given as under: Therefore with well plan manner the amounting to Rs. The State of Chhattisgarh has filed an affidavit of the Additional Superintendent of Police dated 1st August 2016. The appeal accordingly. The murder was a particularly cruel and revolting one and for that reason it will be necessary to examine the evidence with more than ordinary care lest the shocking nature of the crime induce an instinctive reaction against a dispassionate judicial scrutiny of the facts and law.

In such cases the owner can never have consented to the possession of goods by A; the NRI legal services - site, so-called consent being not a real consent is a totally void thing in law. who, by separate but, concurring 'judgments, declared section 7 unconstitutional and void '::and. At the trial, five of the accused were charged with offences under section 302 read with section 149 and under section 201 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 4440891 has deposit in the fake of account of Shri Rate and misuse the above amount and fix in commodity market.

From the above discussion, it becomes clear that High Court is duly empowered to make rules and Rules in question are not ultra vires Section 30 of the Act. It was by deliberate fraud and trick that she got possession. The learned Judges held that the respondent's right to annul under-tenures and evict under-tenants being a vested right acquired by him under his purchase before section 37 was amended, the retrospective deprivation of that right by section 7 of the amending Act without any abatement of the price paid by the respondent at the revenue sale was an infringement of his fundamental right under article 19(1) (f) to hold property with all the rights .

He never intended to contract with the woman in question. It substituted by section 4 'the'new section 37 in the place of the original section 37, and' it provided by section 7 that all pending suits, appeals and other proceedings which had not already resulted in delivery of possession shall' abate. In circumstances such as these, I think that there was no con- sensus ad idem. The appellant obtained special leave to appeal from this court on the 4th February, 1953, and hence this appeal.

and the remaining two accused were charged with the offence under section 201 read with section 149 of that Code. Thus A might obtain possession of goods from the owner by falsely representing himself to be B. , Thereupon, the respondent, contending that section 7 was'void as abriging his fundamental fights under article 19(1) (f) and article 31, moved the High Court 'under article 228 to withdraw the pending appeal and determine the constitutional issue .