5 Simple Techniques For Advocate In Chandigarh
"(1) Every learner's licence and driving licence, except a driving licence issued under section 18, shall be in such form and shall contain such information as may be prescribed by the Central Government. 57 of the Act not being confined to off" serious in their nature or with reference to the attendant circumstances within the Chapters specified therein, prevention of the repetition thereof cannot be considered a reasonable restriction.
On 21-6-1916 when he forwarded the proposal to the Commissioner, he stated: Referring to this aspect, the Deputy Commissioner stated in his note dated 13-6-1916 that the experience gained in the Katras and Jharia coal mines pointed to the wisdom of granting long term license, so that the mines could be worked in the best 348 interests of the Advocates (updated blog post) proprietor and the lessee. It is then that the present petition was filed under article 32 of the Advocates - updated blog post - Constitution challenging the validity of the Order of Advocates (updated blog post) transfer dated the 13th December 1954 and the law under which such order was purported to have been made.
The con- tention is that sub-section (7-A) of section 5 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and the said Order of transfer made thereunder are Advocates, updated blog post, unconstitutional in that they infringe the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner by articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 31 of the Constitution. To what other relief, if any, the plaintiff is entitled? 5(7-A) of the Income Tax Act its assessment records were transferred from that office to the Income Tax Officer, Special Circle, Ranchi with whom the petitioner was to correspond in future regarding its assessment proceedings.
It is alleged and not denied by the respondent that the petitioner had no previous notice of the intention of the Income-tax authorities to transfer the assessment proceedings from Calcutta to Ranchi nor had it any opportunity to make any representation against such decision. It is in excess of what may be considered justifiable. The appellant accordingly applied for three leases of the total extent of 2,461 bighas, and the Board gave sanction to the same on 15-7-1937, and on 2-8-1937, the lease deeds were actually executed.
Similarly, water storage tanks are normally filled with water in case of emergencies and these tanks also cannot be inhabited by the human beings during their normal operation. It was also provided in those deeds that for the areas taken in excess of 10,000 bighas, the minimum royalty would become payable after 26-3-1939. It is only after a lapse of more than a few years that human beings enter these structures that too for the purpose of cleaning only.
On the basis of pleadings of the parties following issues were framed by the trial court: - Whether Ayyappan Chettiar executed a Will in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the property in suit? It would also be equally imperative to salvage the productive assets and realize the amounts due to the banks and financial institutions, to the extent possible, from the non-viable sick industrial companies through liquidation of those companies.
Form and contents of licences to drive. Thereafter on the 2nd May 1955 the Income-tax Officer, Special Circle, Ranchi called upon the petitioner to submit its return for the assessment year 1955-56. The plaintiff got examined himself as PW-1 Andisamy Chettiar and he also got examined PW-2 Selvarajan, stated to be attesting witness of the Will. It will be recalled that under the deeds dated 26-3-1915 and 23-11-1917 the licensees would be entitled to an extension of the period for 12 years from 26-3-1939 to 26-3-1951 provided that they had taken on lease a minimum area of 20,000 bighas, and that the appellant had, in fact, taken on lease only a total extent of 17,539 bighas under six leases during the years 1922 to 1933.
On the 25th January 1955 the petitioner received a letter from the Income-Tax Officer, District III, Calcutta that in pursuance to orders dated 13th December 1954 under s. 83(3) the Tribunal has power to allow particulars in respect of illegal Advocates (this) or corrupt practices to be amended, provided the petition itself specifies the grounds or charges, and this power extends to permitting new instances to be given. These tanks can be cleaned after a lapse of few years only. This was sanctioned by the Board, and the deed dated 1-6-1937 incorporates this amendment in the deeds dated 26-3-1915 and 23-11-1917.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief of permanent injunction? One of them, that relating to Mauza Saunda, contained, in accordance with the terms of the deed dated 1-6-1937, the following covenant: The appellant applied to the Court of Wards sometime in 1934 for amendment of the deeds dated 26-3-1915 and 23-11-1917 so as to provide that the payment of minimum royalty was to commence from 26-3-1951, unless railway facilities were available earlier.
As a condition of the grant of this concession, the Board required the appellant to take a lease of 2,461 bighas 355 to make up the covenanted extent of 20,000 bighas. One other contention of the respondent remains to be considered, and that arises on the statement of the appellant that it does not contest the finding of the High Court that the deed dated 1-6-1937 is void.
