A Secret Weapon For Lawyer In Chandigarh

2013 passed by this Court in Alaknanda Hydro Power Company Limited vs. (emphasis laid by this Court) Further, in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. CIT[1], Heavy Engineering Mazdoor Union vs. The SARFAESI Act, which came into force from 21. The said pay ceiling is achieved in the appellant Banks only when an officer reaches Scale-VII. 18,300/- (5th Central Pay Commission) and in the case of Public Sector Undertakings who are following Industrial Dearness Allowance (IDA) pattern, the monetary ceiling was fixed as ?

The said Act also empowers the said asset reconstruction companies to Advocates (my link) take over the management of the business of the borrower. The sufficiency is the Advocates (my link) high probability of death in the ordinary course of nature. Chief Engineer (O (1897 AC 22) still visits frequently the hounds of Company Law but the veil has been pierced in many cases. Giving false evidence by filing false affidavit is an evil which must be effectively curbed with a strong hand.

This contempt petition under Sections 2(3) and 15 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 read with Article 129 of the Constitution of India alleges violation of directions contained in judgment and order dated 13. As Advocates; my link, a fortiorari, the policy of no reservation in the matter of promotion is applicable only from Scale-VII and above. Anuj Joshi and others[1] (C. It, therefore, clearly follows that insofar as promotion from Scale-I to Scale-II, Scale- II to Scale-III, Scale-III to Scale-IV, Scale-IV to Scale-V, Scale-V to Scale-VI are concerned, reservation is to be provided.

6746-6747/2013 and Transferred Case No. However, during the course of arguments, the petitioners gave up their case against alleged contemnor Nos. Mukharji in the New Jurisprudence (Tagore Law Lectures, P. Depending on the nature of weapon used and situs of the injury, in some cases, the sufficiency of injury to cause death in the ordinary course of nature must be proved and cannot be inferred from the fact that death has, in fact, taken place.

6736/2013 with Civil Appeal No. In the present case the driver Advocates (my link) of the vehicle was not responsible for the accident. 31) The Constitution Bench in this case has explained the true nature of contract relating to Insurance and laid down the relevant factors which the courts should keep in mind while interpreting the contract of insurance. Secretary, Revenue Department[3], Amit Products (India) Ltd. Prosecution should be ordered when it is considered expedient in the interest of justice to punish the delinquent, but there must be a prima facie case of deliberate falsehood on a matter of substance and the court should be satisfied that there is a reasonable foundation for the charge.

The erstwhile partners of the firm which was Advocates (our website) original lessee, had in effect transferred the lease in favour of S/Shri K. 5th Central Pay Commission). Agarwal who took over as Directors of the Private Limited Company at the instance of UTCL. The misuse of the vehicle was somewhat irregular though, but not so fundamental in nature so as to put an end to the contract, unless some factors existed which by themselves, had gone to contribute to the causing of the accident.

Merely by lifting a person or two, or even three, by the driver or the cleaner of the vehicle, without the knowledge of the owner, cannot be said to be such a fundamental breach that the owner should, in all events, be denied indemnification. State of Bihar[2], Electronics Corporation of India Limited vs. 5,700/- mentioned for the purposes of reservation as ? Kirit Somaiya on the allegation that GLKU had sold the mining lease to UTCL which was not permissible and thereby unlawful gain was acquired in connivance with the mining department and loss was caused to the State.

It appears that an FIR dated 7th August, 2014 was also registered with the Jaipur Main Police Centre on a complaint of one Dr. We therefore, confine ourselves in respect of alleged act of contempt on part of alleged contemnor Nos. Some of these have been noted by Justice P. The Department of Public Enterprises had issued an Office Memorandum dated 08-11-2004 as to the salary limit of ? We are also satisfied that no case is made out against them and as such the proceedings against them are dropped.

Four persons are arrayed as alleged contemnors in this petition. The Government may commute the services to be rendered and it will then depend on the terms of the agreement between the holder of the Watan lands and the Government entered into at the time of the commutation whether the lands are to retain their character as Watan lands or not. When the sufficiency exists and death follows, causing of such injury is intended and causing of such offence is murder.

2002, was enacted to provide procedures to the Banks to recover their security interest from the debtors and their collateral security assets as provided under the provisions of the Act. Union of India assignment or sale. The scope of the Act was explained by this Court in the case of Transcore v. The appellant Banks, therefore, cannot take umbrage under the aforesaid Memorandum and deny reservation in favour of SC/ST employees while carrying out promotions upto to Scale-VI.

20,800/- (from 01-01-1996, i. For ascertaining the sufficiency of the injury, sometimes the nature of the weapon used, sometimes the part of the body on which the injury is caused and sometimes both are relevant.