Detailed Notes On NRI Legal Services By LexLords Michigan

From DIGIMAT Digital Learning Platform - Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search

The Commissioner's powers under s. Moncrieffe (3) that the two jurisdictions are other than distinct. In their opinion, however, the contention cannot prevail. 1 and 2 framed in the suit that the institution of the suit of the appellant against Respondents Nos. We are unable to agree with this contention advanced by the learned senior counsel on behalf of the respondents. Jatashankar Dossa (1810) 2 Hag.

7 that Courts in all suits and proceedings under the Act shall act and give relief on principles and rules which in the opinion of the (1) (1810) 161 E. On the contrary, at p. We are concerned in these petitions not with infringement of any of the provisions of Part III but of Art. 589, 187 1476 repugnant to NRI Legal Services (explanation) the provisions of Part III. 372(1) provides for the continuance in force of all laws existing at the date of the Constitution. 286(2) does not provide that a law which contravenes it is void, and when regard is had to the context of that provision, it is difficult to draw the inference that that is the consequence of contravention of that provision.

" These observations lend no support to the view that the word" assessment" must always bear a particular meaning in the Income-tax Act. 33 can only be exercised subject to the provisions of the Act, of which the provisions in ss. While it is true that the word used in the said Article is first learns and not knowledge, it is difficult to construe the word first learns without attributing to it certain degree of knowledge. The terms of the statute recognise this plainly, and I think it would be quite out of keeping with the anxious nature of its provisions to hold that the court might be "satisfied " in respect of a ground for dissolution, with something less than proof beyond reasonable doubt.

The true reason, as it seems to me, why both accept the same general standard- proof beyond reasonable doubt-lies not in any analogy but in the gravity and public importance of the issue with which each is concerned. The period of limitation would start running only on 07. " The jurisdiction in divorce involves the status of the parties and the public interest requires that the marriage NRI Legal Services bond shall not be set aside lightly or without NRI Legal Services strict enquiry. [7] wherein the terms of the NRI Legal Services (hop over to this website) Article were interpreted by this Court as under: The Article 91(a) of the Limitation Act was the subject matter of controversy also in the case of K.

2-10 is barred by limitation. Srinivasan, PW-3, it becomes clear that a meeting in fact, took place on 07. It further stipulates that the period of limitation shall start running from the date when the person ˜first learns about the conversion of the moveable property. Order VIII Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with this aspect, which is reproduced hereunder: B, in which he has stated: 1996, he signed a document, produced before us as Exh.

(iii)the recovery of any tax or penalty which may have become payable under the said Act and the said entries before the said date; and all such taxes or penalties or arrears thereof shall be assessed, imposed and recovered, so far as may be, in accordance with the provisions of this Act; ". Their Lordships would, in any case, hesitate long before acceding to a contention that would lead to so extravagant results. We set aside the finding of the learned Special Court on the contentious issue nos.

There needs to be specific denial by a witness as to the suggestion regarding the happening of a meeting for the Special Court to arrive at the conclusion that the meeting did not take place. 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, was beyond question and as that section, severable as it was from the rest of the Act, must alone be declared ultra vires. S Nanji and Company v. (emphasis laid by this Court) On a careful examination of the above deposition of Mr. 1992, the reasons for which we have already elaborately stated in an earlier part of this judgment.