Details Fiction And NRI Legal Services

That depends on whether the Additional District Judge was a Judge of the District Court or whether he formed a separate Court of his own like the various Subordinate Judges; and that in turn depends on the language of the Punjab Courts Act. That still left the District Court free to act under section 476-A when the matter came back to it again. The SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 in Schedule II provides for Code of Conduct for stock brokers in the following terms :- SCHEDULE II Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-brokers) Regulations, 1992 CODE OF CONDUCT FOR STOCK BROKERS [Regulation 9] A.

Merit of the candidates, the need for an equal distribution of vacancies applying what is described as ˜Black Method and the individual choice expressed by the cadets were also some of the major factors that were taken into consideration while making allocations. Pitam Singh's order but that made no difference because the substance of the matter was this: the original Court had not taken any action, therefore it was incumbent on the District Judge to make an appropriate order either under section 476- A or by sending it for disposal to the only other Court that had jurisdiction, namely the original Court.

The real transaction is sale of mining lease which is not legally permitted. Instead, he sent it to Mr. Pitam Singh who had no jurisdiction. This time it came by way of appeal Advocates (find out here now) from Mr. In case, commissioning of Solar Power Project is delayed beyond 31st December 2011, GUVNL shall pay the tariff as determined by Honble GERC for Solar Projects effective on the date of commissioning of solar power project or above mentioned tariff, whichever is lower.

According to the second view, there are four classes of Subordinate Judge's Courts in the Punjab because of the High Court Notification. The initial allocation of the respondents to different Corps was based on parameters prescribed for that purpose depending inter alia upon the number of actual vacancies in Arms, Arms Support or Services, operational commitments and requirements arising from new raisings. The appeal is, thus, devoid of any merit and accordingly dismissed.

, that they are not inclined to avail the ˜benefit of accelerated depreciation. Advocates (find out here now) It has not been shown that the profits of the intermediaries had been utilised by the appellant. Thus, the doctrine of lifting the veil has to be applied to give effect to law which is sought to be circumvented. Therefore, the finding that the intermediaries were benamidars of the appellant could not stand. The Respondents were commissioned into various Corps/streams of the Indian Army after they successfully passed out from the Indian Military Academy/Officers Training Academy.

Above tariff shall apply for solar projects commissioned on or before 31st December 2011. In the present case, the corporate entity has been used to conceal the real transaction of transfer of mining lease to a third party for consideration without statutory consent by terming it as two separate transactions the first of transforming a partnership into a company and the second of sale of entire shareholding to another company. But the District Judge did not deal with it.

For the aforesaid reasons, we are not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the High Court in the facts of the present case. The right of the 1st respondent not to avail the benefit of accelerated depreciation flows from the Income Tax Act. The position created by the Act, it is said, is not the same as the one that arises when work is -administratively distributed among Additional Judges of the same 136 Court because the jurisdiction and powers of the Judges are unaffected by such distribution and there remains the one Court with one inherent and territorial jurisdiction despite the distribution.

Of course, the District Judge could have sent it to the original Court or to the successor Advocates [have a peek at this web-site] Judge of that Court if there was one, but he sent it to a Court without jurisdiction, so his order was ineffective and the subsequent order of Mr. Another important test of benami is to find who has been in enjoyment of the benefits of the transaction. It is thus clear that the doctrine of lifting the veil can be invoked if the public interest so requires or if there is allegation of violation of law by using the device of a corporate entity.

The application went instead to the Additional District Judge and what Advocates (find out here now) we now have to see is whether the Additional District Judge had the requisite power and authority. The argument here runs that section 18 must be read with section 26, and as the High Court is empowered to divide Subordinate Judges in a district into classes it must mean that each class forms an independent Court, for according to this point of view, it would be anomalous to have Judges of the one Court invested with differing pecuniary jurisdictions because that is always regarded as inherent to the Court.

Pitam Singh was without jurisdiction. Such a right and option is available to the power producers only in one contingency i. It is only the 1st Tariff Order which gives an option to the 1st respondent (for that matter to all the power producers who are similarly situated as the 1st respondent) not to sell the power produced by it at the price specified in the 1st Tariff Order but seek the determination of a separate tariff.

The learned senior counsel has emphatically argued, that in absence of any evidence of the claimed tenancy of the appellants and their constructions on the suit land with the permission either of the State Government or the Municipal Council in existence at the relevant point of time, there is no semblance of any right in them to retain the possession thereof.