NRI Legal Services Can Be Fun For Anyone
That order of the Financial Commissioner was impugned through a writ petition first before the Single Judge and then Advocates (more..) also before the Division Bench through L. The learned Advocates - more.. - Attorney-General has referred us to some oral and documentary evidence to show that the workmen themselves understood the notice dated August 23, 1953, as a notice of discharge. Moreover, this Court does not sit as a regular Court of appeal over Industrial Tribunals, and does not ordinarily subject the evidence given on behalf of the parties to a fresh review and scrutiny, unless it is shown that exceptional or special circumstances exist, or that substantial and grave injustice has been done or that the case 677 in question presents features of sufficient gravity to warrant a review of the decision appealed from.
In Collector of Customs v. On the other side, Mr. Financial Commissioner and lastly They are ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 years, and to pay a fine of Rs. 5 in this appeal had given Army Service Corps as one of the options of his choice. The first grievance is that in fact no opportunity of hearing was afforded by the Consolidation Officer and as a consequence the appellant could not place his case properly to show that there was no occasion to know of the entry of Scheme Kabiz or to challenge the same when it was never made known to affected persons by making allotment on its basis.
The second grievance is that no inquiry was made as to what was the nature of possession reflected as Scheme Kabiz. Since the appellant was unsuccessful throughout, he has preferred the present appeal to raise three- fold grievances. Ajay Chawla-Respondent No. He has referred particularly to the letter dated September 2, 1953, written by the Action Committee to the General Manager of the Company in which the notice dated August 23, 1953, was referred to as " an illegal and unconstitutional notice of discharge".
It cannot be held that once the land owner is allotted lands as per the Rules as a local displaced person, thereafter even if his property is acquired at subsequent stage or at a different place, he will not be a local displaced person. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each, for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Acharya appearing for the respondent workmen has referred us to the evidence given by some of the Company's servants, which showed that no formal order of discharge was recorded in the service book of the employees, as required by the rules; nor any notice of one month given for discharging the workmen; but on the contrary the workmen were given continuity of service for the entire period of their absence.
Section 12-A contained in Chapter V-A of the SEBI Act deals with Prohibition of manipulative and deceptive devices, insider trading and substantial acquisition of securities or control and reads as follows : The exoneration of the respondent in the adjudication proceedings was the basis for petition under Section 482 Cr. referred to supra, which reads as under: On the issue of legislative competence, the learned senior counsel contends that the State exceeded its legislative competence while enacting the aforesaid impugned provisions in the Amendment Act by going beyond the scope of Entry 28 read with Entry 66 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.
According to appellant the land remained under their possession which was also reflected in the revised revenue records prepared pursuant to the finalization of consolidation proceedings. More so, when a law made by the Parliament, namely, the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 already occupied the said field. In support of the second and third contentions noted above, learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance upon judgment of this Court in the case of Mange Ram v.
The last grievance is that the Consolidation Officer as well as other authorities of the High Court failed to appreciate that claim under Section 43A was made after 23 years and such belated claim should not have been entertained or allowed. as already noticed earlier. The respondents were accordingly allocated and have served in their respective Corps and Advocates (why not try here) Raisings as Lt. Local displaced person has to be understood with reference to the acquisition concerned. According to learned counsel for the appellant, if the possession was not through any method of encumbrance known to law but only that of a rank trespasser, such possession could not have been made the basis of allotment under Section 43A of the 1948 Act as has been done by the order of the Consolidation Officer dated Advocates (more..) 24.
We do not, however, think that when the words used in the notices sufficiently and clearly bring out the intention of the Company, it is necessary to refer to other evidence in the record. In default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months. The learned senior counsel places reliance on the following paragraphs of the judgment in the case of ITC Ltd. and such exoneration certainly weighed with the High Court.
